April 23, 2026

Holistic Pulse

Healthcare is more important

Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework

Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework
  • Clark S, Weale A. Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):293–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211238954/FULL/PDF.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes R, Rego G. Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach. Health Care (don Mills) Anal. 2014;22(3):292–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10728-013-0243-6/FIGURES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazbeck AS, Soucat A. When both markets and governments fail health. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(4):268–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1660756;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:KHSR20;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:KHSR20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom H, Olsson JM. Allocation of health care resources: principles for decision-making. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38(7):320–29. https://doi.org/10.1542/PIR.2016-0012.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipgrave DB, Alderman KB, Anderson I, Soto EJ. Health sector priority setting at meso-level in lower and middle income countries: lessons learned, available options and suggested steps. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2013.11.056.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Worafi YM. Healthcare facilities in developing countries: infrastructure. Handb of Med And Health Sci In Dev Countries. Published online, 2024: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74786-2_209-1.

  • Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1929–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61696-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaqeeh M, Alfian SD, Abdulah R. Factors associated with hypertension among adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Indonesian family life survey. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023;19:827–36. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S438180.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. The World Bank In Indonesia. Accessed February 18, 2025.

  • Dewi M. A study on the global supply chain impact to Jakarta as a global business hub in the Asian region. J Retailing Digitainability, Realism Mastery (DREAM). 2023;2(9):14–20. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i09.153.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong W, Rusli M, Bhoelan S, et al. Endemic and emerging acute virus infections in Indonesia: an overview of the past decade and implications for the future. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018;44(4):487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2018.1438986.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaqeeh M, Alfian SD, Abdulah R. Factors associated with diabetes mellitus among adults: findings from the Indonesian family life survey-5. Endocr Metab Sci. 2024;14:100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENDMTS.2024.100161.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bappenas. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024. 2020. Accessed February 22, 2024.

  • Kemenkes. Rencana Aksi Program Kesehatan Masyarakat 2020-2025. Published online 2020.

  • Kemenkes. Rencana Aksi Program Badan PPSDM Kesehatan Tahun 2020-2024. Published online 2020.

  • Anindya K, Lee JT, McPake B, Wilopo SA, Millett C, Carvalho N. Impact of Indonesia’s national health insurance scheme on inequality in access to maternal health services: a propensity score matched analysis. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.10.010429.

  • Laksono AD, Wulandari RD, Soedirham O. Urban and rural disparities in hospital utilization among Indonesian adults. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(2):247. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i2.819.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliki KD, Purba RHP, Supartini N. Promoting long-term care in Indonesia. Shaping Long-Term Care in Emerging Asia: Policy and Ctry Experiences. 104–30. Published online January 1, 2023.

  • Anggriani Y, Andayani N, Rahmi M, et al. Management of JKN medicine: the role of social security agency of health (BPJS-K) in strategic health purchasing. Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian Indonesia. 2023;21(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.35814/JIFI.V21I1.1371.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall E. Health care and democratization in Indonesia. Democratization. 2014;21(5):803–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873791.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurniati A, Rosskam E, Afzal MM, Suryowinoto TB, Mukti AG. Strengthening Indonesia’s health workforce through partnerships. Public Health. 2015;129(9):1138–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUHE.2015.04.012.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramita AA, Purwanti ND. The role of the ministry of national development planning of the republic of Indonesia in public-private partnership. J Infrastruct Policy Manag (JIPM). 2023;6(2):103–16. https://doi.org/10.35166/JIPM.6.2.103-116.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soraya S, Syamanta T, Harahap HSRB, Coovadia C, Greg M. Impact of the National health insurance program (JKN) on access to Public health services: a comprehensive analysis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora. 2023;12(3):133–51. https://doi.org/10.35335/JIPH.V12I3.7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harimurti P, Prawira J, Hort K. The republic of Indonesia health system review Asia Pacific observatory on health Systems and policies. Health Syst Transit. 2017;7(1).

  • Fossati D. Is Indonesian Local government accountable to the poor? Evidence from health policy implementation. J East Asian Stud. 2016;16(3):307–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/JEA.2016.17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas B V, Dionne F, Mitton C. Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13561-020-00300-0/TABLES/4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Harakeh A, Morsi RZ, Fadlallah R, Bou-Karroum L, Lotfi T, Akl EA. Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-019-4567-2/TABLES/6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank T, Dheepa R, Agnes S. Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans. Strategizing National health in the 21st Century: a handbook. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320764951.

  • Wilson N, Cleghorn C, Nghiem N, Blakely T. Prioritization of intervention domains to prevent cardiovascular disease: a country-level case study using global burden of disease and local data. Popul Health Metr. 2023;21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12963-023-00301-1/FIGURES/1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson E, Tinghög G. Needs and cost-effectiveness in health care priority setting. Health Technol (berl). 2020;10(3):611–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12553-020-00424-7/FIGURES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • L MG, Pardo-Hernandez H, Superchi C, et al. Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;86:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2017.05.008.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison LE, Flegg JA, Tobin R, et al. A multi-criteria framework for disease surveillance site selection: case study for plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Indonesia. R Soc Open Sci. 2024;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSOS.230641.

  • Oktaria V, Mahendradhata Y. The health status of Indonesia’s provinces: the double burden of diseases and inequality gap. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(11):e1547–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00405-3.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmawati RS, Heywood A, Sitaresmi MN, et al. Religious and community leaders’ acceptance of rotavirus vaccine introduction in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-019-6706-4/PEER-REVIEW.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Teerawattananon Y, Luz A, Li R, Rattanavipapong W, Dabak S. Institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for universal health coverage: lessons from Indonesia. Inq (U States). 2020;57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958020924920/FORMAT/EPUB.

  • Chavarina KK, Faradiba D, Sari EN, Wang Y, Teerawattananon Y. Health economic evaluations for Indonesia: a systematic review assessing evidence quality and adherence to the Indonesian health technology assessment (HTA) guideline. The Lancet Reg Health – Southeast Asia. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100184.

  • Plan T, Anderson I, Hipgrave D. Political economy analysis country report on Indonesia: a summary of the political economy factors that are shaping the way Indonesia uses evidence. 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280239067.

  • Wasir R, Irawati S, Makady A, et al. The implementation of HTA in medicine pricing and reimbursement policies in Indonesia: insights from multiple stakeholders. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225626. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0225626.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Yoon SJ. Quantifying burden of disease to measure population health in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(Suppl 2):S101–07. https://doi.org/10.3346/JKMS.2016.31.S2.S101.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJL, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, et al. GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2063–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61899-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Devleesschauwer B, De Noordhout CM, Smit GSA, et al. Quantifying burden of disease to support public health policy in Belgium: opportunities and constraints. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1196/FIGURES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In: Lopez A, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Jamison D, Murray C, editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. Washington, D.C: World Bank;2006; 2001. p. 45–240. Accessed February 23, 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröders J, Wall S, Hakimi M, et al. How is Indonesia coping with its epidemic of chronic noncommunicable diseases? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179186. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0179186.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mboi N, Syailendrawati R, Ostroff SM, et al. The state of health in Indonesia’s provinces, 1990-2019. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(11):e1632–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00371-0.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mboi N, Murty Surbakti I, Trihandini I, et al. On the road to universal health care in Indonesia, 1990-2016. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10147):581–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30595-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuady A, Anindhita M, Haniifah M, et al. Bridging the gap: financing health promotion and disease prevention in Indonesia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-024-01206-7/FIGURES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristina SA, Santosa KA. An estimated mortality and disability adjusted life years (Dalys) of non-communicable diseases in Indonesia. Int J Multiling Pharm Res. 2020;12:3040–45. https://doi.org/10.31838/IJPR/2020.SP2.370.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thobari JA, Watts E, Carvalho N, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2025;43:126478. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2024.126478.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):549–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers C. Policy and practice a critical examination of summary measures of population health. 2000.

  • Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Valavanidis A. Global burden of diseases, injuries and risk factors for mortality and disability of adults. 2022.

  • Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Murray CJL. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet. 2003;362(9380):271–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13968-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein EA, Chay J, Bajpai S. The economic burden of self-reported and undiagnosed cardiovascular diseases and diabetes on Indonesian households. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99572. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0099572.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Melse JM, Essink-Bot ML, Kramers PGN, Hoeymans N. A national burden of disease calculation: Dutch disability-adjusted life-years. Dutch burden of disease group. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1241. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1241.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthold R, Johansson EW, Mathers CD, Ross DA. Global and regional levels and trends of child and adolescent morbidity from 2000 to 2016: an analysis of years lost due to disability (YLDs). BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(3):e004996. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2021-004996.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating and validating disability-adjusted life years at the global level: a methodological framework for cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-125/FIGURES/4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond M, Weatherly H, Ferguson B. Economic evaluation of health interventions. BMJ. 2008;337(7673):770–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.A1204.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Health and development challenges of noncommunicable diseases in the South-East Asia region: report of the regional meeting. 2011. Accessed February 24, 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, et al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1438–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60393-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwantika AA, Zakiyah N, Kusuma ASW, Abdulah R, Postma MJ. Impact of switch options on the economics of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) introduction in Indonesia. Nato Adv Sci Inst Se. 2020. 2020;8, 8(2):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES8020233.

  • Boonen A, Severens JL. The burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(SUPPL. 1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10067-010-1634-9/TABLES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96(1):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/BMB/LDQ033.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Boonen A, van den Bergh JP, et al. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a fracture liaison service. J Med Econ. 2022;25(1):829–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2022.2087409.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guindo LA, Wagner M, Baltussen R, et al. From efficacy to equity: literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2012;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-10-9/FIGURES/4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2009.02.002.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 2002;56(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.56.2.119.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill E, Er V, Penney T, et al. Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: a research methods review. Soc Sci Med. 2021;272:113697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2021.113697.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334(7605):1204. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.39198.722720.BE.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the context and implementation of complex interventions (CICI) framework. Implementation Sci. 2017;12(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-017-0552-5/TABLES/5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implementation Sci. 2013;8(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-22/TABLES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh BT, Hatcher J. Health seeking behaviour and health service utilization in Pakistan: challenging the policy makers. J Public Health (bangkok). 2005;27(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDH207.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunuantari M, Farhan RM, Gunawan I. Telemedicine communication during the covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Published online 2022. Accessed February 24, 2024.

  • Bali S. Barriers to development of telemedicine in developing countries. in. Telehealth. Intech. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81723.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Makady A, van Veelen A, Jonsson P, et al. Using real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA) practice: a comparative study of five HTA agencies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(3):359–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-017-0596-Z/FIGURES/4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidayat B. Evolution of health technology assessment in Indonesia: supply landscape, implementation, and future directions. Health Syst Reform. 2023;9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2371470.

  • Cost CA. CONTEXT, AND DECISIONS IN HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(5):434–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462318000612.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ, Collins LM. Optimizing interventions for equitability: some initial ideas. Prev Sci. Published online January 31, 2024;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11121-024-01644-3/FIGURES/3.

  • Sohn H, Tucker A, Ferguson O, Gomes I, Dowdy D. Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-020-01047-2.

  • Niëns LM. Affordability in health care: operationalizations and applications in different contexts. Published online January 10, 2014.

  • LeFevre AE, Shillcutt SD, Broomhead S, Labrique AB, Jones T. Defining a staged-based process for economic and financial evaluations of mHealth programs. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2017;15(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12962-017-0067-6/FIGURES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinja S, Chugh Y, Rajsekar K, Muraleedharan VR. National methodological guidelines to conduct Budget Impact analysis for health technology assessment in India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021;19(6):811–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40258-021-00668-Y/FIGURES/2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski A, Neumann P, Cohen J, Thorat T, McDaniel K, Salomon JA. When cost-effective interventions are unaffordable: integrating cost-effectiveness and budget impact in priority setting for global health programs. PLoS Med. 2017;14(10):e1002397. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1002397.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghabri S, Mauskopf J. The use of budget impact analysis in the economic evaluation of new medicines in Australia, England, France and the United States: relationship to cost-effectiveness analysis and methodological challenges. Eur J Criminol Health Econ. 2018;19(2):173–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10198-017-0933-3/METRICS.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaveye S, De Soete W, De Meester S, et al. Human health benefits and burdens of a pharmaceutical treatment: discussion of a conceptual integrated approach. Environ Res. 2016;144:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2015.10.027.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teerawattananon Y, Tritasavit N, Suchonwanich N, Kingkaew P. The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ZEFQ.2014.06.017.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho N, Jit M, Cox S, Yoong J, Hutubessy RCW. Capturing budget impact considerations within economic evaluations: a systematic review of economic evaluations of rotavirus vaccine in low- and middle-income countries and a proposed assessment framework. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(1):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-017-0569-2/FIGURES/3.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D, Hiligsmann M, John D, Al Ahdab OG, Li H. Pharmacoeconomic analyses and modeling. Clin Pharm Educ, Pract And Res: Clin Pharm, Drug Inf, Pharmacovigil, Pharmacoeconomics and Clin Res. 261–75. Published online January 1, 2019.

  • Rappange DR, Van Baal PHM, Van Exel NJA, Feenstra TL, Rutten FFH, Brouwer WBF. Unrelated medical costs in life-years gained: should they be included in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions? Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(10):815–30. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826100-00003/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2013.04.011.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshima SM, Tait SD, Rushing C, et al. Patient perspectives on the financial costs and burdens of breast cancer surgery. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(6):e872–81. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00780/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/OP.20.00780T2.JPEG.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Susmiati S, Mustofa A. Evaluation of quality and patient expectations of health services for the universal health coverage program at Puskesmas Ketapang Sampang District. J Soc Sci (joss). 2024;3(6):1467–79. https://doi.org/10.57185/JOSS.V3I6.327.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlangga D. The impact evaluation of public health insurance in Indonesia on access to care, financial protection, and health status. Published online September 30, 2018.

  • Lim MY, Kamaruzaman HF, Wu O, Geue C. Health financing challenges in Southeast Asian countries for universal health coverage: a systematic review. Arch Belg. 2023;81(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13690-023-01159-3/FIGURES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Afiatin KL, Kristin E, et al. Economic evaluation of policy options for dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients under the universal health coverage in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177436. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0177436.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Utami S, Supriyono B, Wiweko B, Setyowati E, Brawijaya U. Indonesia M. Model Of Institutional Capacity Devel Of The Health Technol Assess Comm: Study On The Natl Health Insur Program In Indonesia. 2022, 20. https://doi.org/10.14704/NQ.2022.20.15.NQ88053.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantivess S, Teerawattananon Y, Mills A. Strengthening cost-effectiveness analysis in Thailand through the establishment of the health intervention and technology assessment program. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):931–45. https://doi.org/10.2165/11314710-000000000-00000/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-017-2031-8/TABLES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomey E, Flannery C, Matvienko-Sikar K, et al. Exploring healthcare professionals’ views of the acceptability of delivering interventions to promote healthy infant feeding practices within primary care: a qualitative interview study. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(10):2889–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020004954.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim E, Kohrt BA. Cultural adaptation of scalable psychological interventions. Clin Psychol Eur. 2019;1(4):1–22. https://doi.org/10.32872/CPE.V1I4.37679.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756/TABLES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stok FM, De Ridder DTD, De Vet E, et al. Hungry for an intervention? Adolescent’s ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-015-2665-6/TABLES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P, McCarney R, Hasford C, Vickers A. Evaluation of specific and non-specific effects in homeopathy: feasibility study for a randomised trial. Homeopathy. 2006;95(4):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HOMP.2006.07.006/ID/JR00097X-11/BIB.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel KA, Hente E, Herzer M, Ingerski LM, Denson LA. Telehealth behavioral treatment for medication nonadherence: a pilot and feasibility study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(4):469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0B013E32835C2A1B.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochmyaningsih D. Indonesian ‘vaccine fatwa’ sends measles immunization rates plummeting. Science. (1979). Published online November 7, 2018.

  • Kristina SA, Sylva Lienaningrum A. Perception and acceptance of measles-rubella vaccine among mothers in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. 189| Int J Pharm Res. 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.03.024.

  • Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Bellg AJ, et al. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(5):852–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2009;36(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10488-008-0197-4/FIGURES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter C, McDonald C, Story D, Francis JJ. Application of the theoretical framework of acceptability in a surgical setting: theoretical and methodological insights. Br J Health Psychol. 2023;28(4):1153–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJHP.12677.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Martin DK. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(4):766–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2008.11.011.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: final report of the WHO consultative group on Equity and universal health coverage. Health econ policy law. Published online, 2014: Accessed February 19, 2025: 1–7.

  • Nord E. Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(2):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2004.05.003.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson R, Mirelman AJ, Griffin S, et al. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to address health equity concerns. Value Health. 2017;20(2):206–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.11.027.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martiyana C, Latifah L, Nurcahyani YD, Yunitawati D, Khairunnisa M. Demographic characteristics as predictors of medicine and health services access difficulties and economic problems during covid 19 in Java, Indonesia. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. Published online August 16, 2021.

  • Aizawa T, Helble M. Socioeconomic inequality in excessive body weight in Indonesia. Econ Hum Biol. 2017;27:315–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EHB.2017.09.005.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizawa T. Regional disparity in the Body Mass index distribution of Indonesians: new evidence beyond the mean. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2018;54(1):85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1406596.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemling C, Qaim M. Obesity trends and determinants in Indonesia. Appetite. 2012;58(3):1005–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPET.2012.02.053.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizawa T. Inequality in health opportunities in Indonesia: long-term influence of early-life circumstances on health. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-022-13714-8/TABLES/4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky I. Wellness as fairness. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1–2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10464-011-9448-8/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale E, Peacocke EF, Movik E, et al. Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2023;38(Suppl 1):i13. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZAD066.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagbakken M, Frich JC, Bjune GA, Porter JDH. Ethical aspects of directly observed treatment for tuberculosis: a cross-cultural comparison. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-25/PEER-REVIEW.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters S. The rule of rescue: an investigation into age-related preferences and the imperative to save a life. 2015;10(3):70–79.

  • McKie J, Richardson J. The rule of rescue. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(12):2407–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00244-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur M, Saha R, Kapilashrami A. Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: a systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness. J Glob Health. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.13.04034.

  • Sadare O, Williams M, Simon L. Implementation of the health Equity Impact assessment (HEIA) tool in a local public health setting: challenges, facilitators, and impacts. Can J Public Health. 2020;111(2):212–19. https://doi.org/10.17269/S41997-019-00269-2/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels N, Sabin J. Setting limits fairly: can we learn to share medical resources?.

  • Angelis A, Kanavos P. Value-based assessment of new medical technologies: towards a robust methodological framework for the application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(5):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-015-0370-Z/TABLES/2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton CR, Donaldson C. Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Health Policy (new Y). 2003;64(3):335–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.

  • O’Donnell JC, Pham S V, Pashos CL, Miller DW, Smith MD. Health technology assessment: lessons learned from around the world – an overview. Value Health. 2009;12(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1524-4733.2009.00550.X.

  • Tobi P. Health needs assessment. Public Health Intel: Issues Of Measure And Method. Published online April 26, 2016;169–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28326-5_9/COVER.

  • Mencken HL. Developing and Prioritizin g intervention options. Evidence-Based Public Health. 2010;178.

  • Blacksher E, Rigby E, Espey C. Public values, health inequality, and alternative notions of a “fair” response. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010;35(6):889–920. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2010-033.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rid A. Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions? J Med Ethics. 2009;35(1):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/JME.2008.024430.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting Tong W, Kong Lee Y, Jenn Ng C, Yein Lee P. Development of an implementation intervention to integrate the use of health innovations in routine practice: an insulin patient decision aid as an exemplar. Published online November 20, 2023.

  • Latif RA, Dahlan A, Ab Mulud Z, Zarawi M, Nor M. The Delphi technique as a Method to obtain consensus in health Care Education research. Educ In Med J. 2017;9(3):89–102. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2017.9.3.10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp N, Baltussen R. Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-454/TABLES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley LT, Egan R, Stockley D, Johnson AP. Evaluating multi-criteria decision-making in health technology assessment. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7(3):310–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2018.05.002.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemenkes. EVALUASI EKONOMI DAN PENILAIAN TEKNOLOGI KESEHATAN. Published online 2021.

  • Kemenkes. Health Technology Assessment Diperlukan Agar Manfaat Jaminan Kesehatan Sesuai dengan Kebutuhan Medis – Sehat Negeriku. 2013. Accessed February 16, 2025.

  • Yuniarti E, Prabandari YS, Kristin E, Suryawati S. Rationing for medicines by health care providers in Indonesia National health insurance system at hospital setting: a qualitative study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40545-019-0170-5.

  • Velasco Garrido M, Gerhardus A, Røttingen, Busse R. Developing health technology assessment to address health care system needs. Health Policy (new Y). 2010;94(3):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2009.10.002.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmhøj Nielsen, Funch TM, Kristensen FB. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe. 2011;16(SUPPL. 2):6–15.

  • Fasseeh AN, Saragih SM, Hayek N, et al. Impact of health technology assessment implementation with a special focus on middle-income countries. Health Policy Technol. 2022;11(4):100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2022.100688.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijlmakers L, Mueller D, Kahveci R, Chen Y, Van Der Wilt GJ. INTEGRATE-HTA: a LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(5):599–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462317000927.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakha F, Suriyawongpaisul P, Sangrajrang S, Leerapan B, Coker R. Breast cancer in Thailand: policy and health system challenges to universal healthcare. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2020;35(9):1159–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZAA063.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuniar P. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for breast cancer in Indonesia. Published online 2022. Accessed February 29, 2024.

  • Teljeur C, Moran P, Harrington P, Ryan M. The HIQA’s health technology assessment of breast screening: highlighting some of the challenges posed by evaluations of screening programs. Value Health. 2017;20(7):1000–02. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.11.024.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teutsch SM, Berger ML. Evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision making: related but distinct processes. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25(5):487–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05281156/ASSET/0272989X05281156.FP.PNG_V03.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oortwijn W, Jansen M, Baltussen R. Use of evidence-informed deliberative processes by health technology assessment agencies around the Globe. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(1):27. https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2019.72.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemzoff C, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, et al. Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4):e004549. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2020-004549.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemzoff C, Shah HA, Heupink LF, et al. Adaptive health technology assessment: a scoping review of methods. Value Health. 2023;26(10):1549–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2023.05.017.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000664.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MD, Mataloto I, Kanavos P. Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art. Eur J Criminol Health Econ. 2019;20(6):891–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10198-019-01052-3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oortwijn W, Determann D, Schiffers K, Tan SS, van der Tuin J. Towards integrated health technology assessment for improving decision making in selected countries. Value Health. 2017;20(8):1121–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2017.03.011.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JSM, Pollock M, Kaunelis D, Weeks L. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-022-02071-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRS RD briefing 86 – review of HTA outcomes and timelines in Australia, Canada and Europe 2017–2021 – CIRS. Accessed February 29, 2024.

  • Mitton C, Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2004;2(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-2-3/TABLES/4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson LR, Scott A. The costs of caring for stroke patients in a GP-led community hospital: an application of programme budgeting and marginal analysis. Health Soc Care Community. 2001;9(4):244–54. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2524.2001.00300.X.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton C, Donaldson C, Shellian B, Pagenkopf C. Priority setting in a Canadian surgical department: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis. Can J Surg. 2003;46(1):23. Accessed February 29, 2024./pmc/articles/PMC3211667/.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles JM, Brown G, Thomas K, et al. Use of programme budgeting and marginal analysis as a framework for resource reallocation in respiratory care in North Wales, UK. J Public Health (bangkok). 2016;38(3):e352–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDV128.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noya F, Carr S, Thompson S. Social accountability in a medical school: is it sufficient? A regional medical school curriculum and approaches to equip graduates for rural and remote medical services. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-024-05522-Y/TABLES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangoma J, Sulistiadi W. Island health crisis: bridging gaps in Indonesia’s healthcare deserts. J Indones Health Policy And Adm. 2024;9(2):5. https://doi.org/10.7454/ihpa.v9i2.1005.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Christanti J V, Setiadi AP, Setiawan E, et al. Community-based approach to promote rational Use of antibiotics in Indonesia: the development and assessment of an Education program for cadres. 2023;44(3):281–93.

  • Peacock S, Mitton C, Bate A, McCoy B, Donaldson C. Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy (new Y). 2009;92(2–3):124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2009.02.006.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller RF, Edwards R, Patterson L, Elhassan M. Public health in primary care trusts: a resource needs assessment. Public Health Nutr. 2003;117(3):157–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00081-7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bani IA. HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Published online 2008.

  • Asadi-Lari M, Gray D. Health needs assessment tools: progress and potential. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):288–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050385.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J, Wright J, Ayres P, et al. Health needs assessment and needs-led health service change: a survey of projects involving public health doctors. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(2):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927719.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Long J, Deady J, O’Keeffe F, Handy D, O’Dowd T. Adapting developing country epidemiological assessment techniques to improve the quality of health needs assessments in developed countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-32.

  • Riches DN. Assessing the health needs of a population. 2012;5(12):719–24.

  • Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Fagen MC. Basic priority rating Model 2.0: current applications for priority setting in health promotion practice. 2011;12(2):166–71.

  • Lee EH, Park JO, Cho JP, Lee CA. Prioritising risk factors for prescription drug overdose among older adults in South Korea: a multi-method study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5948. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18115948/S1.

  • Choi BCK, Maza RA, Mujica OJ, et al. The pan American health organization-adapted Hanlon method for prioritization of health programs. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2019;43. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.61.

  • Vilnius D, Dandoy S. A priority rating system for public health programs. Public Health Rep. 1990;105(5):463. Accessed March 2, 2024./pmc/articles/PMC1580091/?report=abstract.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bæroe K, Baltussen R. Legitimate healthcare limit setting in a real-world setting: integrating accountability for reasonableness and multi-criteria decision analysis. Public Health Nutr Ethics. 2014;7(2):98–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/PHE/PHU006.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauridsen S, Lippert-Rasmussen K. Legitimate allocation of Public healthcare: beyond accountability for reasonableness. Public Health Nutr Ethics. 2009;2(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/PHE/PHP001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford A. Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18(2):217–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11019-014-9592-7/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Samaha D, Casciano R, et al. Moving towards accountability for reasonableness – a systematic exploration of the features of legitimate healthcare coverage decision-making processes using rare diseases and regenerative therapies as a case study. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7):424. https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2019.24.

  • Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Sebastiån MS, et al. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):751–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2010.04.035.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp N, Prawiranegara R, Riparev HS, Siregar A, Sunjaya D, Baltussen R. Priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in west java Indonesia: an evaluation based on the accountability for reasonableness framework. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2015;30(3):345–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZU020.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapiriri L, Baltussen R, Oortwijn W. Implementing evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment: a low income country perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462319003398.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluka S, Kamuzora P, San Sebastin M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Hurtig AK. Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: perceptions of stakeholders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-322/TABLES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan SS, Kelly F, Sav A, et al. Using the nominal group technique: how to analyse across multiple groups. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14(3):92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10742-014-0121-1/TABLES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Søndergaard E, Ertmann RK, Reventlow S, Lykke K. Using a modified nominal group technique to develop general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12875-018-0811-9/TABLES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott TR, Shewchuk RM. Using the nominal group technique to identify the problems experienced by persons living with severe physical disabilities. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2002;9(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014931924809/METRICS.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore MD, Hall AG, Wingate MS, Ford EW. Achieving consensus among stakeholders using the nominal group technique: a perinatal quality collaborative approach. Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(3):161–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000384.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu H, Shewchuk R, Hu X, et al. Input from multiple stakeholder levels prioritizes targets for improving implementation of an exercise intervention for rural women cancer survivors. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43058-020-00061-1/FIGURES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter M, Hamer PW, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. NZ J Physiother. 2004;32:70. Accessed March 3, 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastrana T, Radbruch L, Nauck F, et al. Outcome indicators in palliative care-how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany. Supportive Care In Cancer. 2010;18(7):859–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00520-009-0721-4/TABLES/4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1440-172X.2012.02017.X.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SP, Birrell M. Defining an occupational therapy intervention for people with psychosis. 2007;70(3):96–106.

  • Nelson V, Dubov A, Morton K, Fraenkel L. Using nominal group technique among resident physicians to identify key attributes of a burnout prevention program. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264921. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0264921.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambra C, Joyce KE, Bellis MA, et al. Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy. J Public Health (bangkok). 2010;32(4):496–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDQ028.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assess, Res, And Evaluation. 2019;12(1):10. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Steenkiste BC, Jacobs JE, Verheijen NM, Levelink JH, Bottema BJAM. A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient record for asthma. Int J Med Inf. 2002;65(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00223-4.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousuf MI. Using Experts’ opinions through delphi technique. Practical Assess, Res, And Evaluation. 2019;12(1):4. https://doi.org/10.7275/rrph-t210.

  • Meshkat B, Cowman S, Gethin G, et al. Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. J Hosp Adm. 2014;3(4):1. https://doi.org/10.5430/JHA.V3N4P1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11096-016-0257-X/FIGURES/2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner S, Ollerhead E, Cook A. Identifying research priorities for public health research to address health inequalities: use of Delphi-like survey methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-017-0252-2/TABLES/6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui TD, Tsai FM, Tseng ML, Ali MDH. Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy delphi method. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;154:104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.104625.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag. 2004;42(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2003.11.002.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Skulmoski GJ, Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi Method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ: Res. 2007;6(1):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran-Kooiker A, Czech M, Kooiker C. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models in health technology assessment of orphan drugs-a systematic literature review. Next Steps In Methodol Devel? Front Public Health. 2018;6:404746. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2018.00287/BIBTEX.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2006;4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-14/FIGURES/2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). 2011;32(2):376–88.

  • Reddy BP, Walters SJ, Duenas A, Thokala P, Kelly MP. A role for MCDA to navigate the trade-offs in the National institute for health and Care Excellence’s public health recommendations. Oper Res Health Care. 2019;23:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORHC.2019.02.001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortnam M, Chaigneau T, Evans L, Bastian L. Practitioner approaches to trade-off decision-making in marine conservation development. People Nat. 2023;5(5):1636–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAN3.10530.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh KD, Sculpher M, Caro JJ, Tervonen T. The use of MCDA in HTA: great potential, but more effort needed. Value Health. 2018;21(4):394–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2017.10.001.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A. Making good decisions in healthcare with multi-criteria decision analysis: the use, current research and future development of MCDA. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40258-015-0203-4/METRICS.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Wen B, He C, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Xu F. Application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis to rural spatial sustainability evaluation: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health And Public Health. 2022;19(11):6572. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19116572.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratanova A, Cameron A, Thavat M, Fyfield A, Hajkowicz S. Priority setting in international trade – application of multiple criteria decision analysis for Australian-Indonesia trade in the health sector. SSRN Electron J. Published online December 9, 2023.

  • Bratanova A, Hajkowicz S. Multiple criteria decision analysis for trade promotion. Published online 2023. Accessed March 4, 2024.

  • Inotai A, Brixner D, Maniadakis N, et al. Development of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for off-patent pharmaceuticals – an application on improving tender decision making in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-018-3805-3/TABLES/5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen M, Spasenoska D, Nadjib M, et al. National immunization program decision making using the CAPACITI decision-support tool: user feedback from Indonesia and Ethiopia. Nato Adv Sci Inst Se. 2024;12,. (3):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES12030337.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwantika AA, Purwadi F V, Zakiyah N, et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize the introduction of new vaccines in Indonesia by using the framework of the strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines (SMART vaccines). Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2021.1874926.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashiro A, Kohsaka R. Universal health coverage: healthcare system for universal health coverage under partnerships. Published Online. 2021;1319–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95963-4_18.

  • Mills S, Lee JK, Rassekh BM, et al. Unique health identifiers for universal health coverage. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41043-019-0180-6.

  • United Nations. Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to transform our world. 2015. Accessed March 5, 2024.

  • Barasa E, Nguhiu P, McIntyre D. Measuring progress towards sustainable development goal 3.8 on universal health coverage in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(3):e000904. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2018-000904.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal S, Channon AA, Carter S, Falkingham J. Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12939-015-0184-9/TABLES/6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman AR. Assessing the universal health coverage target in the sustainable development goals from a human rights perspective. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12914-016-0106-Y/PEER-REVIEW.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan M. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(1):5–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2015.1111288.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbold B, Baker R, Ferraz O, et al. Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):712–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30931-5.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat R, Holtz J, Avila C. Reaching the missing middle: ensuring health coverage for India’s urban poor. Health Syst Reform. 2018;4(2):125–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1445425.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhaus IM. Identifying health system priorities for equitable access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Published online May 7, 2020. Accessed March 5, 2024.

  • Jaca A, Malinga T, Iwu-Jaja CJ, et al. Strengthening the health system as a strategy to achieving a universal health coverage in underprivileged communities in Africa: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health And Public Health. 2022;19(1):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19010587.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid M, Gupta R, Roberts G, Goosby E, Wesson P. Achieving universal health coverage (UHC): dominance analysis across 183 countries highlights importance of strengthening health workforce. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229666. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0229666.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(2):e152–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30472-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkidou K, Morris L. Francis Ruiz. Process matters for priority setting and health technology assessment. 2015. https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673609607601.pdf.

  • Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny MP, Wagstaff A. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001731. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001731.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturier V, Srivastava S, Hidayat B, De Allegri M. Out-of-pocket expenditure and patient experience of care under-Indonesia’s national health insurance: a cross-sectional facility-based study in six provinces. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37(S1):79–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/HPM.3543.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Glandon D, Meghani A, Jessani N, Qiu M, Bennett S. Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 4):e000970. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2018-000970.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon C, Luitel NP, Kathree T, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated mental health Care: a district level situation analysis from Five Low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88437. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0088437.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamey G. What are the barriers to scaling up health interventions in low and middle income countries? A qualitative study of academic leaders in implementation science. Globalizat Health. 2012;8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-8-11/FIGURES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelowo AB. Analyzing the magnitude of global epidemiological transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a need to review the current healthcare management approach. TEXILA Int J Public Health. 2021;9(3):204–12. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJPH.2013.09.03.Art018.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins DA, Jamison DT, Mills A, et al. Universal health coverage and essential packages of care. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (VolumeImproving Health And Reducing Poverty. 9:43–65. Published online September 14, 2018.

  • Aryankhesal A, Behzadifar M, Bakhtiari A, et al. Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-023-01097-0/TABLES/11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed IA, Kariuki J, Mathu D, et al. Health systems’ capacity in availability of human resource for health towards implementation of universal health coverage in Kenya. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0297438. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0297438.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdana NR, Adhasari G, Mahadewi EP. Challenges and implementation of universal health coverage program in Indonesia. Int J Health Serv And Pharm (IJHP). 2022;2(3):589–96. https://doi.org/10.51601/IJHP.V2I3.97.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahendradhata Y, Andayani NLPE, Hasri ET, et al. The capacity of the Indonesian healthcare system to respond to COVID-19. Front Public Health. 2021;9:649819. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.649819/BIBTEX.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Nizar Shihaba AAN, Kadirc A. Hasbullah Thabranyd, Idrus Paturusie. Equity in Utilization of Inpatient For Natl Health Insur (JKN) Program In Indonesia. Published online 2017.

  • Agustina R, Dartanto T, Sitompul R, et al. Universal health coverage in Indonesia: concept, progress, and challenges. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):75–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31647-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser AH, Rotigliano N, Flessa S, Ekman B, Sundewall J. Extending universal health coverage to informal workers: a systematic review of health financing schemes in low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288269. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0288269.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marthias T, Anindya K, Ng N, et al. Impact of non-communicable disease multimorbidity on health service use, catastrophic health expenditure and productivity loss in Indonesia: a population-based panel data analysis study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e041870. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-041870.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidayah N, Dewi A, Jen-Ho O, Aini Q. THE NEED TO REFORM THE HOSPITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM IN INDONESIA. Malays J Public Health Med. 2019;19(2):132–40. https://doi.org/10.37268/MJPHM/VOL.19/NO.2/ART.197.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Teerawattananon Y, Dabak SV, et al. A landscape analysis of health technology assessment capacity in the Association of South-East Asian Nations region. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-020-00647-0/FIGURES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibie WL. Health reform in Indonesia towards sustainable development growth (case study on BPJS Kesehatan, health insurance in Indonesia). Accessed February 17, 2025.

  • Rakmawati T, Hinchcliff R, Pardosi JF. District-level impacts of health system decentralization in Indonesia: a systematic review. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34(2):e1026–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/HPM.2768.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Cao Z, Zhao Y. Paradigm transformation of global health Data regulation: challenges in governance and human rights protection of cross-border Data flows. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024;17:3291–304. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S450082.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, et al. Brazilian unified health system-the first 30 years and prospects for the future: modelling study. Published online 2019.

  • Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, et al. Brazil’s unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future. Lancet. 2019;394(10195):345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro SC, Selaya NG, Perz SG, et al. Aligning conservation and development goals with rural community priorities: capacity building for forest health monitoring in an extractive reserve in Brazil. Ecol And Soc. 2020;25(3):art5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11665-250305.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013;91(11):853–63. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.118729.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicos M, Fabrega R, Vivas G, Suarez J. Brazil. Mais Medicos Program; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J, Selway J. EXCHANGE: EXPLAINING THE PASSAGE OF UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE IN THAILAND. J East Asian Stud. 2020;20(1):99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/JEA.2019.42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Panichkriangkrai W, Patcharanarumol W, Mills A. Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1205–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangcharoensathien V, Prakongsai P, Limwattananon S, Patcharanarumol W, Jongudomsuk P. Achieving universal coverage in Thailand: what lessons do we learn? SSRN Electron J. Published online March 1, 2007.

  • Rohde J, Cousens S, Chopra M, et al. 30 years after Alma-Ata: has primary health care worked in countries? Lancet. 2008;372(9642):950–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61405-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuda TK, Pholpark A. Healthcare expansion in Indonesia and Thailand: a causal mechanism and its implications for welfare regimes. J Int And Comp Soc Policy. 2022;38(2):111–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/ICS.2022.6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumriddetchkajorn K, Shimazaki K, Ono T, Kusaba T, Sato K, Kobayashi N. Universal health coverage and primary care, Thailand. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019;97(6):415. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.223693.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel FG, Buchweitz C, Onocko Campos RT, Hallal PC, Massuda A, Kieling C. Realising the future: health challenges and achievements in Brazil. ssm – Ment Health. 2023;4:100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMMH.2023.100250.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ota MOC, Kirigia DG, Asamoah-Odei E, et al. Proceedings of the first African health forum: effective partnerships and intersectoral collaborations are critical for attainment of universal health coverage in Africa. BMC Proc. 2018;12(7):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12919-018-0104-2/METRICS.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teklehaimanot HD, Teklehaimanot A. Human resource development for a community-based health extension program: a case study from Ethiopia. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-39/TABLES/3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Building the primary health care workforce of the 21st century. Published online 2018.

  • Yang M, Jaafar N, Al Mamun A, Salameh AA, Nawi NC. Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM-neural network analysis. J Innov Entrep. 2022;11(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13731-022-00232-5/FIGURES/1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Setijadi C. The pandemic as political opportunity: Jokowi’s Indonesia in the time of covid-19. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2021;57(3):297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.2004342.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.