Clark S, Weale A. Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):293–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211238954/FULL/PDF.
Google Scholar
Nunes R, Rego G. Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach. Health Care (don Mills) Anal. 2014;22(3):292–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10728-013-0243-6/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Yazbeck AS, Soucat A. When both markets and governments fail health. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(4):268–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1660756;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:KHSR20;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:KHSR20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION.
Google Scholar
Ransom H, Olsson JM. Allocation of health care resources: principles for decision-making. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38(7):320–29. https://doi.org/10.1542/PIR.2016-0012.
Google Scholar
Hipgrave DB, Alderman KB, Anderson I, Soto EJ. Health sector priority setting at meso-level in lower and middle income countries: lessons learned, available options and suggested steps. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2013.11.056.
Google Scholar
Al-Worafi YM. Healthcare facilities in developing countries: infrastructure. Handb of Med And Health Sci In Dev Countries. Published online, 2024: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74786-2_209-1.
Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1929–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61696-1.
Google Scholar
Alfaqeeh M, Alfian SD, Abdulah R. Factors associated with hypertension among adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Indonesian family life survey. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023;19:827–36. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S438180.
Google Scholar
World Bank. The World Bank In Indonesia. Accessed February 18, 2025.
Dewi M. A study on the global supply chain impact to Jakarta as a global business hub in the Asian region. J Retailing Digitainability, Realism Mastery (DREAM). 2023;2(9):14–20. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v2i09.153.
Google Scholar
de Jong W, Rusli M, Bhoelan S, et al. Endemic and emerging acute virus infections in Indonesia: an overview of the past decade and implications for the future. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018;44(4):487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2018.1438986.
Google Scholar
Alfaqeeh M, Alfian SD, Abdulah R. Factors associated with diabetes mellitus among adults: findings from the Indonesian family life survey-5. Endocr Metab Sci. 2024;14:100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENDMTS.2024.100161.
Google Scholar
Bappenas. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024. 2020. Accessed February 22, 2024.
Kemenkes. Rencana Aksi Program Kesehatan Masyarakat 2020-2025. Published online 2020.
Kemenkes. Rencana Aksi Program Badan PPSDM Kesehatan Tahun 2020-2024. Published online 2020.
Anindya K, Lee JT, McPake B, Wilopo SA, Millett C, Carvalho N. Impact of Indonesia’s national health insurance scheme on inequality in access to maternal health services: a propensity score matched analysis. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.10.010429.
Laksono AD, Wulandari RD, Soedirham O. Urban and rural disparities in hospital utilization among Indonesian adults. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(2):247. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i2.819.
Google Scholar
Maliki KD, Purba RHP, Supartini N. Promoting long-term care in Indonesia. Shaping Long-Term Care in Emerging Asia: Policy and Ctry Experiences. 104–30. Published online January 1, 2023.
Anggriani Y, Andayani N, Rahmi M, et al. Management of JKN medicine: the role of social security agency of health (BPJS-K) in strategic health purchasing. Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian Indonesia. 2023;21(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.35814/JIFI.V21I1.1371.
Google Scholar
Aspinall E. Health care and democratization in Indonesia. Democratization. 2014;21(5):803–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873791.
Google Scholar
Kurniati A, Rosskam E, Afzal MM, Suryowinoto TB, Mukti AG. Strengthening Indonesia’s health workforce through partnerships. Public Health. 2015;129(9):1138–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUHE.2015.04.012.
Google Scholar
Paramita AA, Purwanti ND. The role of the ministry of national development planning of the republic of Indonesia in public-private partnership. J Infrastruct Policy Manag (JIPM). 2023;6(2):103–16. https://doi.org/10.35166/JIPM.6.2.103-116.
Google Scholar
Soraya S, Syamanta T, Harahap HSRB, Coovadia C, Greg M. Impact of the National health insurance program (JKN) on access to Public health services: a comprehensive analysis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora. 2023;12(3):133–51. https://doi.org/10.35335/JIPH.V12I3.7.
Google Scholar
Harimurti P, Prawira J, Hort K. The republic of Indonesia health system review Asia Pacific observatory on health Systems and policies. Health Syst Transit. 2017;7(1).
Fossati D. Is Indonesian Local government accountable to the poor? Evidence from health policy implementation. J East Asian Stud. 2016;16(3):307–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/JEA.2016.17.
Google Scholar
Seixas B V, Dionne F, Mitton C. Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13561-020-00300-0/TABLES/4.
Google Scholar
El-Harakeh A, Morsi RZ, Fadlallah R, Bou-Karroum L, Lotfi T, Akl EA. Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-019-4567-2/TABLES/6.
Google Scholar
Frank T, Dheepa R, Agnes S. Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans. Strategizing National health in the 21st Century: a handbook. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320764951.
Wilson N, Cleghorn C, Nghiem N, Blakely T. Prioritization of intervention domains to prevent cardiovascular disease: a country-level case study using global burden of disease and local data. Popul Health Metr. 2023;21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12963-023-00301-1/FIGURES/1.
Google Scholar
Gustavsson E, Tinghög G. Needs and cost-effectiveness in health care priority setting. Health Technol (berl). 2020;10(3):611–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12553-020-00424-7/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
L MG, Pardo-Hernandez H, Superchi C, et al. Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;86:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2017.05.008.
Google Scholar
Harrison LE, Flegg JA, Tobin R, et al. A multi-criteria framework for disease surveillance site selection: case study for plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Indonesia. R Soc Open Sci. 2024;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSOS.230641.
Oktaria V, Mahendradhata Y. The health status of Indonesia’s provinces: the double burden of diseases and inequality gap. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(11):e1547–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00405-3.
Google Scholar
Padmawati RS, Heywood A, Sitaresmi MN, et al. Religious and community leaders’ acceptance of rotavirus vaccine introduction in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-019-6706-4/PEER-REVIEW.
Google Scholar
Sharma M, Teerawattananon Y, Luz A, Li R, Rattanavipapong W, Dabak S. Institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for universal health coverage: lessons from Indonesia. Inq (U States). 2020;57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958020924920/FORMAT/EPUB.
Chavarina KK, Faradiba D, Sari EN, Wang Y, Teerawattananon Y. Health economic evaluations for Indonesia: a systematic review assessing evidence quality and adherence to the Indonesian health technology assessment (HTA) guideline. The Lancet Reg Health – Southeast Asia. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100184.
Plan T, Anderson I, Hipgrave D. Political economy analysis country report on Indonesia: a summary of the political economy factors that are shaping the way Indonesia uses evidence. 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280239067.
Wasir R, Irawati S, Makady A, et al. The implementation of HTA in medicine pricing and reimbursement policies in Indonesia: insights from multiple stakeholders. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225626. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0225626.
Google Scholar
Yoon J, Yoon SJ. Quantifying burden of disease to measure population health in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(Suppl 2):S101–07. https://doi.org/10.3346/JKMS.2016.31.S2.S101.
Google Scholar
Murray CJL, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, et al. GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2063–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61899-6.
Google Scholar
Devleesschauwer B, De Noordhout CM, Smit GSA, et al. Quantifying burden of disease to support public health policy in Belgium: opportunities and constraints. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1196/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In: Lopez A, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Jamison D, Murray C, editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. Washington, D.C: World Bank;2006; 2001. p. 45–240. Accessed February 23, 2024.
Schröders J, Wall S, Hakimi M, et al. How is Indonesia coping with its epidemic of chronic noncommunicable diseases? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179186. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0179186.
Google Scholar
Mboi N, Syailendrawati R, Ostroff SM, et al. The state of health in Indonesia’s provinces, 1990-2019. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(11):e1632–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00371-0.
Google Scholar
Mboi N, Murty Surbakti I, Trihandini I, et al. On the road to universal health care in Indonesia, 1990-2016. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10147):581–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30595-6.
Google Scholar
Fuady A, Anindhita M, Haniifah M, et al. Bridging the gap: financing health promotion and disease prevention in Indonesia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-024-01206-7/FIGURES/3.
Google Scholar
Kristina SA, Santosa KA. An estimated mortality and disability adjusted life years (Dalys) of non-communicable diseases in Indonesia. Int J Multiling Pharm Res. 2020;12:3040–45. https://doi.org/10.31838/IJPR/2020.SP2.370.
Google Scholar
Thobari JA, Watts E, Carvalho N, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2025;43:126478. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2024.126478.
Google Scholar
Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):549–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7.
Google Scholar
Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers C. Policy and practice a critical examination of summary measures of population health. 2000.
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO Press; 2008.
Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
Google Scholar
Valavanidis A. Global burden of diseases, injuries and risk factors for mortality and disability of adults. 2022.
Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Murray CJL. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet. 2003;362(9380):271–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13968-2.
Google Scholar
Finkelstein EA, Chay J, Bajpai S. The economic burden of self-reported and undiagnosed cardiovascular diseases and diabetes on Indonesian households. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99572. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0099572.
Google Scholar
Melse JM, Essink-Bot ML, Kramers PGN, Hoeymans N. A national burden of disease calculation: Dutch disability-adjusted life-years. Dutch burden of disease group. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1241. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1241.
Google Scholar
Guthold R, Johansson EW, Mathers CD, Ross DA. Global and regional levels and trends of child and adolescent morbidity from 2000 to 2016: an analysis of years lost due to disability (YLDs). BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(3):e004996. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2021-004996.
Google Scholar
Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating and validating disability-adjusted life years at the global level: a methodological framework for cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-125/FIGURES/4.
Google Scholar
Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015. A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
Google Scholar
Drummond M, Weatherly H, Ferguson B. Economic evaluation of health interventions. BMJ. 2008;337(7673):770–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.A1204.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Health and development challenges of noncommunicable diseases in the South-East Asia region: report of the regional meeting. 2011. Accessed February 24, 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, et al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1438–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60393-0.
Google Scholar
Suwantika AA, Zakiyah N, Kusuma ASW, Abdulah R, Postma MJ. Impact of switch options on the economics of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) introduction in Indonesia. Nato Adv Sci Inst Se. 2020. 2020;8, 8(2):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES8020233.
Boonen A, Severens JL. The burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(SUPPL. 1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10067-010-1634-9/TABLES/1.
Google Scholar
Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96(1):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/BMB/LDQ033.
Google Scholar
Li N, Boonen A, van den Bergh JP, et al. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a fracture liaison service. J Med Econ. 2022;25(1):829–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2022.2087409.
Google Scholar
Guindo LA, Wagner M, Baltussen R, et al. From efficacy to equity: literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2012;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-10-9/FIGURES/4.
Google Scholar
Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2009.02.002.
Google Scholar
Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 2002;56(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.56.2.119.
Google Scholar
McGill E, Er V, Penney T, et al. Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: a research methods review. Soc Sci Med. 2021;272:113697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2021.113697.
Google Scholar
Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334(7605):1204. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.39198.722720.BE.
Google Scholar
Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the context and implementation of complex interventions (CICI) framework. Implementation Sci. 2017;12(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-017-0552-5/TABLES/5.
Google Scholar
Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implementation Sci. 2013;8(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-22/TABLES/1.
Google Scholar
Shaikh BT, Hatcher J. Health seeking behaviour and health service utilization in Pakistan: challenging the policy makers. J Public Health (bangkok). 2005;27(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDH207.
Google Scholar
Sunuantari M, Farhan RM, Gunawan I. Telemedicine communication during the covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Published online 2022. Accessed February 24, 2024.
Bali S. Barriers to development of telemedicine in developing countries. in. Telehealth. Intech. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81723.
Google Scholar
Makady A, van Veelen A, Jonsson P, et al. Using real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA) practice: a comparative study of five HTA agencies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(3):359–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-017-0596-Z/FIGURES/4.
Google Scholar
Hidayat B. Evolution of health technology assessment in Indonesia: supply landscape, implementation, and future directions. Health Syst Reform. 2023;9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2371470.
Cost CA. CONTEXT, AND DECISIONS IN HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(5):434–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462318000612.
Google Scholar
Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ, Collins LM. Optimizing interventions for equitability: some initial ideas. Prev Sci. Published online January 31, 2024;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11121-024-01644-3/FIGURES/3.
Sohn H, Tucker A, Ferguson O, Gomes I, Dowdy D. Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-020-01047-2.
Niëns LM. Affordability in health care: operationalizations and applications in different contexts. Published online January 10, 2014.
LeFevre AE, Shillcutt SD, Broomhead S, Labrique AB, Jones T. Defining a staged-based process for economic and financial evaluations of mHealth programs. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2017;15(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12962-017-0067-6/FIGURES/3.
Google Scholar
Prinja S, Chugh Y, Rajsekar K, Muraleedharan VR. National methodological guidelines to conduct Budget Impact analysis for health technology assessment in India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021;19(6):811–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40258-021-00668-Y/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Bilinski A, Neumann P, Cohen J, Thorat T, McDaniel K, Salomon JA. When cost-effective interventions are unaffordable: integrating cost-effectiveness and budget impact in priority setting for global health programs. PLoS Med. 2017;14(10):e1002397. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1002397.
Google Scholar
Ghabri S, Mauskopf J. The use of budget impact analysis in the economic evaluation of new medicines in Australia, England, France and the United States: relationship to cost-effectiveness analysis and methodological challenges. Eur J Criminol Health Econ. 2018;19(2):173–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10198-017-0933-3/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Debaveye S, De Soete W, De Meester S, et al. Human health benefits and burdens of a pharmaceutical treatment: discussion of a conceptual integrated approach. Environ Res. 2016;144:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2015.10.027.
Google Scholar
Teerawattananon Y, Tritasavit N, Suchonwanich N, Kingkaew P. The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ZEFQ.2014.06.017.
Google Scholar
Carvalho N, Jit M, Cox S, Yoong J, Hutubessy RCW. Capturing budget impact considerations within economic evaluations: a systematic review of economic evaluations of rotavirus vaccine in low- and middle-income countries and a proposed assessment framework. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(1):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-017-0569-2/FIGURES/3.
Google Scholar
Thomas D, Hiligsmann M, John D, Al Ahdab OG, Li H. Pharmacoeconomic analyses and modeling. Clin Pharm Educ, Pract And Res: Clin Pharm, Drug Inf, Pharmacovigil, Pharmacoeconomics and Clin Res. 261–75. Published online January 1, 2019.
Rappange DR, Van Baal PHM, Van Exel NJA, Feenstra TL, Rutten FFH, Brouwer WBF. Unrelated medical costs in life-years gained: should they be included in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions? Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(10):815–30. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826100-00003/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2013.04.011.
Google Scholar
Oshima SM, Tait SD, Rushing C, et al. Patient perspectives on the financial costs and burdens of breast cancer surgery. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(6):e872–81. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00780/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/OP.20.00780T2.JPEG.
Google Scholar
Susmiati S, Mustofa A. Evaluation of quality and patient expectations of health services for the universal health coverage program at Puskesmas Ketapang Sampang District. J Soc Sci (joss). 2024;3(6):1467–79. https://doi.org/10.57185/JOSS.V3I6.327.
Google Scholar
Erlangga D. The impact evaluation of public health insurance in Indonesia on access to care, financial protection, and health status. Published online September 30, 2018.
Lim MY, Kamaruzaman HF, Wu O, Geue C. Health financing challenges in Southeast Asian countries for universal health coverage: a systematic review. Arch Belg. 2023;81(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13690-023-01159-3/FIGURES/3.
Google Scholar
Afiatin KL, Kristin E, et al. Economic evaluation of policy options for dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients under the universal health coverage in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177436. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0177436.
Google Scholar
Utami S, Supriyono B, Wiweko B, Setyowati E, Brawijaya U. Indonesia M. Model Of Institutional Capacity Devel Of The Health Technol Assess Comm: Study On The Natl Health Insur Program In Indonesia. 2022, 20. https://doi.org/10.14704/NQ.2022.20.15.NQ88053.
Google Scholar
Tantivess S, Teerawattananon Y, Mills A. Strengthening cost-effectiveness analysis in Thailand through the establishment of the health intervention and technology assessment program. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):931–45. https://doi.org/10.2165/11314710-000000000-00000/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-017-2031-8/TABLES/3.
Google Scholar
Toomey E, Flannery C, Matvienko-Sikar K, et al. Exploring healthcare professionals’ views of the acceptability of delivering interventions to promote healthy infant feeding practices within primary care: a qualitative interview study. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(10):2889–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020004954.
Google Scholar
Heim E, Kohrt BA. Cultural adaptation of scalable psychological interventions. Clin Psychol Eur. 2019;1(4):1–22. https://doi.org/10.32872/CPE.V1I4.37679.
Google Scholar
Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
Stok FM, De Ridder DTD, De Vet E, et al. Hungry for an intervention? Adolescent’s ratings of acceptability of eating-related intervention strategies. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-015-2665-6/TABLES/3.
Google Scholar
Fisher P, McCarney R, Hasford C, Vickers A. Evaluation of specific and non-specific effects in homeopathy: feasibility study for a randomised trial. Homeopathy. 2006;95(4):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HOMP.2006.07.006/ID/JR00097X-11/BIB.
Google Scholar
Hommel KA, Hente E, Herzer M, Ingerski LM, Denson LA. Telehealth behavioral treatment for medication nonadherence: a pilot and feasibility study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(4):469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0B013E32835C2A1B.
Google Scholar
Rochmyaningsih D. Indonesian ‘vaccine fatwa’ sends measles immunization rates plummeting. Science. (1979). Published online November 7, 2018.
Kristina SA, Sylva Lienaningrum A. Perception and acceptance of measles-rubella vaccine among mothers in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. 189| Int J Pharm Res. 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.03.024.
Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Bellg AJ, et al. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(5):852–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852.
Google Scholar
Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2009;36(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10488-008-0197-4/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Paynter C, McDonald C, Story D, Francis JJ. Application of the theoretical framework of acceptability in a surgical setting: theoretical and methodological insights. Br J Health Psychol. 2023;28(4):1153–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJHP.12677.
Google Scholar
Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Martin DK. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(4):766–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2008.11.011.
Google Scholar
WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: final report of the WHO consultative group on Equity and universal health coverage. Health econ policy law. Published online, 2014: Accessed February 19, 2025: 1–7.
Nord E. Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(2):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2004.05.003.
Google Scholar
Cookson R, Mirelman AJ, Griffin S, et al. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to address health equity concerns. Value Health. 2017;20(2):206–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.11.027.
Google Scholar
Martiyana C, Latifah L, Nurcahyani YD, Yunitawati D, Khairunnisa M. Demographic characteristics as predictors of medicine and health services access difficulties and economic problems during covid 19 in Java, Indonesia. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. Published online August 16, 2021.
Aizawa T, Helble M. Socioeconomic inequality in excessive body weight in Indonesia. Econ Hum Biol. 2017;27:315–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EHB.2017.09.005.
Google Scholar
Aizawa T. Regional disparity in the Body Mass index distribution of Indonesians: new evidence beyond the mean. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2018;54(1):85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1406596.
Google Scholar
Roemling C, Qaim M. Obesity trends and determinants in Indonesia. Appetite. 2012;58(3):1005–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPET.2012.02.053.
Google Scholar
Aizawa T. Inequality in health opportunities in Indonesia: long-term influence of early-life circumstances on health. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-022-13714-8/TABLES/4.
Google Scholar
Prilleltensky I. Wellness as fairness. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1–2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10464-011-9448-8/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Dale E, Peacocke EF, Movik E, et al. Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2023;38(Suppl 1):i13. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZAD066.
Google Scholar
Sagbakken M, Frich JC, Bjune GA, Porter JDH. Ethical aspects of directly observed treatment for tuberculosis: a cross-cultural comparison. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-25/PEER-REVIEW.
Google Scholar
Watters S. The rule of rescue: an investigation into age-related preferences and the imperative to save a life. 2015;10(3):70–79.
McKie J, Richardson J. The rule of rescue. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(12):2407–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00244-7.
Google Scholar
Arthur M, Saha R, Kapilashrami A. Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: a systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness. J Glob Health. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.13.04034.
Sadare O, Williams M, Simon L. Implementation of the health Equity Impact assessment (HEIA) tool in a local public health setting: challenges, facilitators, and impacts. Can J Public Health. 2020;111(2):212–19. https://doi.org/10.17269/S41997-019-00269-2/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Daniels N, Sabin J. Setting limits fairly: can we learn to share medical resources?.
Angelis A, Kanavos P. Value-based assessment of new medical technologies: towards a robust methodological framework for the application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(5):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40273-015-0370-Z/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
Mitton CR, Donaldson C. Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Health Policy (new Y). 2003;64(3):335–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.
O’Donnell JC, Pham S V, Pashos CL, Miller DW, Smith MD. Health technology assessment: lessons learned from around the world – an overview. Value Health. 2009;12(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1524-4733.2009.00550.X.
Tobi P. Health needs assessment. Public Health Intel: Issues Of Measure And Method. Published online April 26, 2016;169–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28326-5_9/COVER.
Mencken HL. Developing and Prioritizin g intervention options. Evidence-Based Public Health. 2010;178.
Blacksher E, Rigby E, Espey C. Public values, health inequality, and alternative notions of a “fair” response. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010;35(6):889–920. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2010-033.
Google Scholar
Rid A. Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions? J Med Ethics. 2009;35(1):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/JME.2008.024430.
Google Scholar
Ting Tong W, Kong Lee Y, Jenn Ng C, Yein Lee P. Development of an implementation intervention to integrate the use of health innovations in routine practice: an insulin patient decision aid as an exemplar. Published online November 20, 2023.
Latif RA, Dahlan A, Ab Mulud Z, Zarawi M, Nor M. The Delphi technique as a Method to obtain consensus in health Care Education research. Educ In Med J. 2017;9(3):89–102. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2017.9.3.10.
Google Scholar
Tromp N, Baltussen R. Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-454/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
Kelley LT, Egan R, Stockley D, Johnson AP. Evaluating multi-criteria decision-making in health technology assessment. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7(3):310–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2018.05.002.
Google Scholar
Kemenkes. EVALUASI EKONOMI DAN PENILAIAN TEKNOLOGI KESEHATAN. Published online 2021.
Kemenkes. Health Technology Assessment Diperlukan Agar Manfaat Jaminan Kesehatan Sesuai dengan Kebutuhan Medis – Sehat Negeriku. 2013. Accessed February 16, 2025.
Yuniarti E, Prabandari YS, Kristin E, Suryawati S. Rationing for medicines by health care providers in Indonesia National health insurance system at hospital setting: a qualitative study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40545-019-0170-5.
Velasco Garrido M, Gerhardus A, Røttingen, Busse R. Developing health technology assessment to address health care system needs. Health Policy (new Y). 2010;94(3):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2009.10.002.
Google Scholar
Palmhøj Nielsen, Funch TM, Kristensen FB. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe. 2011;16(SUPPL. 2):6–15.
Fasseeh AN, Saragih SM, Hayek N, et al. Impact of health technology assessment implementation with a special focus on middle-income countries. Health Policy Technol. 2022;11(4):100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2022.100688.
Google Scholar
Bijlmakers L, Mueller D, Kahveci R, Chen Y, Van Der Wilt GJ. INTEGRATE-HTA: a LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(5):599–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462317000927.
Google Scholar
Lakha F, Suriyawongpaisul P, Sangrajrang S, Leerapan B, Coker R. Breast cancer in Thailand: policy and health system challenges to universal healthcare. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2020;35(9):1159–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZAA063.
Google Scholar
Yuniar P. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for breast cancer in Indonesia. Published online 2022. Accessed February 29, 2024.
Teljeur C, Moran P, Harrington P, Ryan M. The HIQA’s health technology assessment of breast screening: highlighting some of the challenges posed by evaluations of screening programs. Value Health. 2017;20(7):1000–02. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.11.024.
Google Scholar
Teutsch SM, Berger ML. Evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision making: related but distinct processes. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25(5):487–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05281156/ASSET/0272989X05281156.FP.PNG_V03.
Google Scholar
Oortwijn W, Jansen M, Baltussen R. Use of evidence-informed deliberative processes by health technology assessment agencies around the Globe. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(1):27. https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2019.72.
Google Scholar
Nemzoff C, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, et al. Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4):e004549. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2020-004549.
Google Scholar
Nemzoff C, Shah HA, Heupink LF, et al. Adaptive health technology assessment: a scoping review of methods. Value Health. 2023;26(10):1549–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2023.05.017.
Google Scholar
Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000664.
Google Scholar
Oliveira MD, Mataloto I, Kanavos P. Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art. Eur J Criminol Health Econ. 2019;20(6):891–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10198-019-01052-3.
Google Scholar
Oortwijn W, Determann D, Schiffers K, Tan SS, van der Tuin J. Towards integrated health technology assessment for improving decision making in selected countries. Value Health. 2017;20(8):1121–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2017.03.011.
Google Scholar
Kim JSM, Pollock M, Kaunelis D, Weeks L. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-022-02071-7.
Google Scholar
CIRS RD briefing 86 – review of HTA outcomes and timelines in Australia, Canada and Europe 2017–2021 – CIRS. Accessed February 29, 2024.
Mitton C, Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2004;2(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-2-3/TABLES/4.
Google Scholar
Henderson LR, Scott A. The costs of caring for stroke patients in a GP-led community hospital: an application of programme budgeting and marginal analysis. Health Soc Care Community. 2001;9(4):244–54. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2524.2001.00300.X.
Google Scholar
Mitton C, Donaldson C, Shellian B, Pagenkopf C. Priority setting in a Canadian surgical department: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis. Can J Surg. 2003;46(1):23. Accessed February 29, 2024./pmc/articles/PMC3211667/.
Google Scholar
Charles JM, Brown G, Thomas K, et al. Use of programme budgeting and marginal analysis as a framework for resource reallocation in respiratory care in North Wales, UK. J Public Health (bangkok). 2016;38(3):e352–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDV128.
Google Scholar
Noya F, Carr S, Thompson S. Social accountability in a medical school: is it sufficient? A regional medical school curriculum and approaches to equip graduates for rural and remote medical services. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-024-05522-Y/TABLES/1.
Google Scholar
Mangoma J, Sulistiadi W. Island health crisis: bridging gaps in Indonesia’s healthcare deserts. J Indones Health Policy And Adm. 2024;9(2):5. https://doi.org/10.7454/ihpa.v9i2.1005.
Google Scholar
Christanti J V, Setiadi AP, Setiawan E, et al. Community-based approach to promote rational Use of antibiotics in Indonesia: the development and assessment of an Education program for cadres. 2023;44(3):281–93.
Peacock S, Mitton C, Bate A, McCoy B, Donaldson C. Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy (new Y). 2009;92(2–3):124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2009.02.006.
Google Scholar
Heller RF, Edwards R, Patterson L, Elhassan M. Public health in primary care trusts: a resource needs assessment. Public Health Nutr. 2003;117(3):157–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00081-7.
Google Scholar
Bani IA. HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Published online 2008.
Asadi-Lari M, Gray D. Health needs assessment tools: progress and potential. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):288–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050385.
Google Scholar
Jordan J, Wright J, Ayres P, et al. Health needs assessment and needs-led health service change: a survey of projects involving public health doctors. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(2):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927719.
Google Scholar
Smith SM, Long J, Deady J, O’Keeffe F, Handy D, O’Dowd T. Adapting developing country epidemiological assessment techniques to improve the quality of health needs assessments in developed countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-32.
Riches DN. Assessing the health needs of a population. 2012;5(12):719–24.
Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Fagen MC. Basic priority rating Model 2.0: current applications for priority setting in health promotion practice. 2011;12(2):166–71.
Lee EH, Park JO, Cho JP, Lee CA. Prioritising risk factors for prescription drug overdose among older adults in South Korea: a multi-method study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5948. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18115948/S1.
Choi BCK, Maza RA, Mujica OJ, et al. The pan American health organization-adapted Hanlon method for prioritization of health programs. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2019;43. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.61.
Vilnius D, Dandoy S. A priority rating system for public health programs. Public Health Rep. 1990;105(5):463. Accessed March 2, 2024./pmc/articles/PMC1580091/?report=abstract.
Google Scholar
Bæroe K, Baltussen R. Legitimate healthcare limit setting in a real-world setting: integrating accountability for reasonableness and multi-criteria decision analysis. Public Health Nutr Ethics. 2014;7(2):98–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/PHE/PHU006.
Google Scholar
Lauridsen S, Lippert-Rasmussen K. Legitimate allocation of Public healthcare: beyond accountability for reasonableness. Public Health Nutr Ethics. 2009;2(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/PHE/PHP001.
Google Scholar
Ford A. Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18(2):217–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11019-014-9592-7/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Wagner M, Samaha D, Casciano R, et al. Moving towards accountability for reasonableness – a systematic exploration of the features of legitimate healthcare coverage decision-making processes using rare diseases and regenerative therapies as a case study. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7):424. https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2019.24.
Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Sebastiån MS, et al. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):751–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2010.04.035.
Google Scholar
Tromp N, Prawiranegara R, Riparev HS, Siregar A, Sunjaya D, Baltussen R. Priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in west java Indonesia: an evaluation based on the accountability for reasonableness framework. Health Policy (new Y) Plan. 2015;30(3):345–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZU020.
Google Scholar
Kapiriri L, Baltussen R, Oortwijn W. Implementing evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment: a low income country perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462319003398.
Google Scholar
Maluka S, Kamuzora P, San Sebastin M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Hurtig AK. Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: perceptions of stakeholders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-322/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
McMillan SS, Kelly F, Sav A, et al. Using the nominal group technique: how to analyse across multiple groups. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14(3):92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10742-014-0121-1/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
Søndergaard E, Ertmann RK, Reventlow S, Lykke K. Using a modified nominal group technique to develop general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12875-018-0811-9/TABLES/2.
Google Scholar
Elliott TR, Shewchuk RM. Using the nominal group technique to identify the problems experienced by persons living with severe physical disabilities. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2002;9(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014931924809/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Moore MD, Hall AG, Wingate MS, Ford EW. Achieving consensus among stakeholders using the nominal group technique: a perinatal quality collaborative approach. Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(3):161–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000384.
Google Scholar
Qu H, Shewchuk R, Hu X, et al. Input from multiple stakeholder levels prioritizes targets for improving implementation of an exercise intervention for rural women cancer survivors. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43058-020-00061-1/FIGURES/1.
Google Scholar
Potter M, Hamer PW, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. NZ J Physiother. 2004;32:70. Accessed March 3, 2024.
Pastrana T, Radbruch L, Nauck F, et al. Outcome indicators in palliative care-how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany. Supportive Care In Cancer. 2010;18(7):859–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00520-009-0721-4/TABLES/4.
Google Scholar
Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1440-172X.2012.02017.X.
Google Scholar
Cook SP, Birrell M. Defining an occupational therapy intervention for people with psychosis. 2007;70(3):96–106.
Nelson V, Dubov A, Morton K, Fraenkel L. Using nominal group technique among resident physicians to identify key attributes of a burnout prevention program. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264921. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0264921.
Google Scholar
Bambra C, Joyce KE, Bellis MA, et al. Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy. J Public Health (bangkok). 2010;32(4):496–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDQ028.
Google Scholar
Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assess, Res, And Evaluation. 2019;12(1):10. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90.
Google Scholar
Van Steenkiste BC, Jacobs JE, Verheijen NM, Levelink JH, Bottema BJAM. A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient record for asthma. Int J Med Inf. 2002;65(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00223-4.
Google Scholar
Yousuf MI. Using Experts’ opinions through delphi technique. Practical Assess, Res, And Evaluation. 2019;12(1):4. https://doi.org/10.7275/rrph-t210.
Meshkat B, Cowman S, Gethin G, et al. Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. J Hosp Adm. 2014;3(4):1. https://doi.org/10.5430/JHA.V3N4P1.
Google Scholar
McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11096-016-0257-X/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Turner S, Ollerhead E, Cook A. Identifying research priorities for public health research to address health inequalities: use of Delphi-like survey methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-017-0252-2/TABLES/6.
Google Scholar
Bui TD, Tsai FM, Tseng ML, Ali MDH. Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy delphi method. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;154:104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.104625.
Google Scholar
Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag. 2004;42(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2003.11.002.
Google Scholar
Skulmoski GJ, Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi Method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ: Res. 2007;6(1):1–21.
Baran-Kooiker A, Czech M, Kooiker C. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models in health technology assessment of orphan drugs-a systematic literature review. Next Steps In Methodol Devel? Front Public Health. 2018;6:404746. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2018.00287/BIBTEX.
Google Scholar
Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Effectiveness And Resource Allocation. 2006;4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-14/FIGURES/2.
Google Scholar
Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). 2011;32(2):376–88.
Reddy BP, Walters SJ, Duenas A, Thokala P, Kelly MP. A role for MCDA to navigate the trade-offs in the National institute for health and Care Excellence’s public health recommendations. Oper Res Health Care. 2019;23:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORHC.2019.02.001.
Google Scholar
Fortnam M, Chaigneau T, Evans L, Bastian L. Practitioner approaches to trade-off decision-making in marine conservation development. People Nat. 2023;5(5):1636–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAN3.10530.
Google Scholar
Marsh KD, Sculpher M, Caro JJ, Tervonen T. The use of MCDA in HTA: great potential, but more effort needed. Value Health. 2018;21(4):394–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2017.10.001.
Google Scholar
Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A. Making good decisions in healthcare with multi-criteria decision analysis: the use, current research and future development of MCDA. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40258-015-0203-4/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Yuan Z, Wen B, He C, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Xu F. Application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis to rural spatial sustainability evaluation: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health And Public Health. 2022;19(11):6572. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19116572.
Google Scholar
Bratanova A, Cameron A, Thavat M, Fyfield A, Hajkowicz S. Priority setting in international trade – application of multiple criteria decision analysis for Australian-Indonesia trade in the health sector. SSRN Electron J. Published online December 9, 2023.
Bratanova A, Hajkowicz S. Multiple criteria decision analysis for trade promotion. Published online 2023. Accessed March 4, 2024.
Inotai A, Brixner D, Maniadakis N, et al. Development of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for off-patent pharmaceuticals – an application on improving tender decision making in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-018-3805-3/TABLES/5.
Google Scholar
Jansen M, Spasenoska D, Nadjib M, et al. National immunization program decision making using the CAPACITI decision-support tool: user feedback from Indonesia and Ethiopia. Nato Adv Sci Inst Se. 2024;12,. (3):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES12030337.
Google Scholar
Suwantika AA, Purwadi F V, Zakiyah N, et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize the introduction of new vaccines in Indonesia by using the framework of the strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines (SMART vaccines). Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2021.1874926.
Google Scholar
Tashiro A, Kohsaka R. Universal health coverage: healthcare system for universal health coverage under partnerships. Published Online. 2021;1319–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95963-4_18.
Mills S, Lee JK, Rassekh BM, et al. Unique health identifiers for universal health coverage. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41043-019-0180-6.
United Nations. Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to transform our world. 2015. Accessed March 5, 2024.
Barasa E, Nguhiu P, McIntyre D. Measuring progress towards sustainable development goal 3.8 on universal health coverage in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(3):e000904. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2018-000904.
Google Scholar
Neal S, Channon AA, Carter S, Falkingham J. Universal health care and equity: evidence of maternal health based on an analysis of demographic and household survey data. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12939-015-0184-9/TABLES/6.
Google Scholar
Chapman AR. Assessing the universal health coverage target in the sustainable development goals from a human rights perspective. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12914-016-0106-Y/PEER-REVIEW.
Google Scholar
Chan M. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(1):5–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2015.1111288.
Google Scholar
Rumbold B, Baker R, Ferraz O, et al. Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):712–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30931-5.
Google Scholar
Bhat R, Holtz J, Avila C. Reaching the missing middle: ensuring health coverage for India’s urban poor. Health Syst Reform. 2018;4(2):125–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1445425.
Google Scholar
Feldhaus IM. Identifying health system priorities for equitable access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Published online May 7, 2020. Accessed March 5, 2024.
Jaca A, Malinga T, Iwu-Jaja CJ, et al. Strengthening the health system as a strategy to achieving a universal health coverage in underprivileged communities in Africa: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health And Public Health. 2022;19(1):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19010587.
Google Scholar
Reid M, Gupta R, Roberts G, Goosby E, Wesson P. Achieving universal health coverage (UHC): dominance analysis across 183 countries highlights importance of strengthening health workforce. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229666. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0229666.
Google Scholar
Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(2):e152–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30472-2.
Google Scholar
Chalkidou K, Morris L. Francis Ruiz. Process matters for priority setting and health technology assessment. 2015. https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673609607601.pdf.
Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny MP, Wagstaff A. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001731. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001731.
Google Scholar
Couturier V, Srivastava S, Hidayat B, De Allegri M. Out-of-pocket expenditure and patient experience of care under-Indonesia’s national health insurance: a cross-sectional facility-based study in six provinces. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37(S1):79–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/HPM.3543.
Google Scholar
Glandon D, Meghani A, Jessani N, Qiu M, Bennett S. Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 4):e000970. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJGH-2018-000970.
Google Scholar
Hanlon C, Luitel NP, Kathree T, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated mental health Care: a district level situation analysis from Five Low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88437. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0088437.
Google Scholar
Yamey G. What are the barriers to scaling up health interventions in low and middle income countries? A qualitative study of academic leaders in implementation science. Globalizat Health. 2012;8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-8-11/FIGURES/1.
Google Scholar
Adelowo AB. Analyzing the magnitude of global epidemiological transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a need to review the current healthcare management approach. TEXILA Int J Public Health. 2021;9(3):204–12. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJPH.2013.09.03.Art018.
Google Scholar
Watkins DA, Jamison DT, Mills A, et al. Universal health coverage and essential packages of care. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (VolumeImproving Health And Reducing Poverty. 9:43–65. Published online September 14, 2018.
Aryankhesal A, Behzadifar M, Bakhtiari A, et al. Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-023-01097-0/TABLES/11.
Google Scholar
Ahmed IA, Kariuki J, Mathu D, et al. Health systems’ capacity in availability of human resource for health towards implementation of universal health coverage in Kenya. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0297438. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0297438.
Google Scholar
Perdana NR, Adhasari G, Mahadewi EP. Challenges and implementation of universal health coverage program in Indonesia. Int J Health Serv And Pharm (IJHP). 2022;2(3):589–96. https://doi.org/10.51601/IJHP.V2I3.97.
Google Scholar
Mahendradhata Y, Andayani NLPE, Hasri ET, et al. The capacity of the Indonesian healthcare system to respond to COVID-19. Front Public Health. 2021;9:649819. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.649819/BIBTEX.
Google Scholar
Ahmad Nizar Shihaba AAN, Kadirc A. Hasbullah Thabranyd, Idrus Paturusie. Equity in Utilization of Inpatient For Natl Health Insur (JKN) Program In Indonesia. Published online 2017.
Agustina R, Dartanto T, Sitompul R, et al. Universal health coverage in Indonesia: concept, progress, and challenges. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):75–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31647-7.
Google Scholar
Kaiser AH, Rotigliano N, Flessa S, Ekman B, Sundewall J. Extending universal health coverage to informal workers: a systematic review of health financing schemes in low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288269. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0288269.
Google Scholar
Marthias T, Anindya K, Ng N, et al. Impact of non-communicable disease multimorbidity on health service use, catastrophic health expenditure and productivity loss in Indonesia: a population-based panel data analysis study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e041870. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-041870.
Google Scholar
Hidayah N, Dewi A, Jen-Ho O, Aini Q. THE NEED TO REFORM THE HOSPITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM IN INDONESIA. Malays J Public Health Med. 2019;19(2):132–40. https://doi.org/10.37268/MJPHM/VOL.19/NO.2/ART.197.
Google Scholar
Sharma M, Teerawattananon Y, Dabak SV, et al. A landscape analysis of health technology assessment capacity in the Association of South-East Asian Nations region. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-020-00647-0/FIGURES/3.
Google Scholar
Habibie WL. Health reform in Indonesia towards sustainable development growth (case study on BPJS Kesehatan, health insurance in Indonesia). Accessed February 17, 2025.
Rakmawati T, Hinchcliff R, Pardosi JF. District-level impacts of health system decentralization in Indonesia: a systematic review. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34(2):e1026–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/HPM.2768.
Google Scholar
Xia L, Cao Z, Zhao Y. Paradigm transformation of global health Data regulation: challenges in governance and human rights protection of cross-border Data flows. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024;17:3291–304. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S450082.
Google Scholar
Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, et al. Brazilian unified health system-the first 30 years and prospects for the future: modelling study. Published online 2019.
Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, et al. Brazil’s unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future. Lancet. 2019;394(10195):345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7.
Google Scholar
Ribeiro SC, Selaya NG, Perz SG, et al. Aligning conservation and development goals with rural community priorities: capacity building for forest health monitoring in an extractive reserve in Brazil. Ecol And Soc. 2020;25(3):art5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11665-250305.
Google Scholar
Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013;91(11):853–63. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.118729.
Google Scholar
Medicos M, Fabrega R, Vivas G, Suarez J. Brazil. Mais Medicos Program; 2013.
Harris J, Selway J. EXCHANGE: EXPLAINING THE PASSAGE OF UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE IN THAILAND. J East Asian Stud. 2020;20(1):99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/JEA.2019.42.
Google Scholar
Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Panichkriangkrai W, Patcharanarumol W, Mills A. Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1205–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3.
Google Scholar
Tangcharoensathien V, Prakongsai P, Limwattananon S, Patcharanarumol W, Jongudomsuk P. Achieving universal coverage in Thailand: what lessons do we learn? SSRN Electron J. Published online March 1, 2007.
Rohde J, Cousens S, Chopra M, et al. 30 years after Alma-Ata: has primary health care worked in countries? Lancet. 2008;372(9642):950–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61405-1.
Google Scholar
Yuda TK, Pholpark A. Healthcare expansion in Indonesia and Thailand: a causal mechanism and its implications for welfare regimes. J Int And Comp Soc Policy. 2022;38(2):111–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/ICS.2022.6.
Google Scholar
Sumriddetchkajorn K, Shimazaki K, Ono T, Kusaba T, Sato K, Kobayashi N. Universal health coverage and primary care, Thailand. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019;97(6):415. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.223693.
Google Scholar
Pimentel FG, Buchweitz C, Onocko Campos RT, Hallal PC, Massuda A, Kieling C. Realising the future: health challenges and achievements in Brazil. ssm – Ment Health. 2023;4:100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMMH.2023.100250.
Google Scholar
Ota MOC, Kirigia DG, Asamoah-Odei E, et al. Proceedings of the first African health forum: effective partnerships and intersectoral collaborations are critical for attainment of universal health coverage in Africa. BMC Proc. 2018;12(7):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12919-018-0104-2/METRICS.
Google Scholar
Teklehaimanot HD, Teklehaimanot A. Human resource development for a community-based health extension program: a case study from Ethiopia. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-39/TABLES/3.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Building the primary health care workforce of the 21st century. Published online 2018.
Yang M, Jaafar N, Al Mamun A, Salameh AA, Nawi NC. Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM-neural network analysis. J Innov Entrep. 2022;11(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13731-022-00232-5/FIGURES/1.
Google Scholar
Setijadi C. The pandemic as political opportunity: Jokowi’s Indonesia in the time of covid-19. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2021;57(3):297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.2004342.
Google Scholar
link