A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: from basic principles to clinical translation
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vollger, M. R. et al. Segmental duplications and their variation in a complete human genome. Science 376, eabj6965 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hoyt, S. J. et al. From telomere to telomere: the transcriptional and epigenetic state of human repeat elements. Science 376, eabk3112 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gershman, A. et al. Epigenetic patterns in a complete human genome. Science 376, eabj5089 (2022).
Google Scholar
Altemose, N. et al. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 376, eabl4178 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aganezov, S. et al. A complete reference genome improves analysis of human genetic variation. Science 376, eabl3533 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liao, W.-W. et al. A draft human pangenome reference. Nature 617, 312–324 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gao, Y. et al. A pangenome reference of 36 Chinese populations. Nature 619, 112–121 (2023).
Wang, T. et al. The Human Pangenome Project: a global resource to map genomic diversity. Nature 604, 437–446 (2022).
Google Scholar
Huang, T., Shu, Y. & Cai, Y.-D. Genetic differences among ethnic groups. BMC Genomics 16, 1093 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gest, H. The discovery of microorganisms by Robert Hooke and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Fellows of The Royal Society. Notes Rec. R. Soc. Lond. 58, 187–201 (2004).
Google Scholar
The Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature 569, 641–648 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550, 61–66 (2017).
Google Scholar
Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 16, 276–289 (2014).
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
Google Scholar
MetaHIT Consortium. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010).
Google Scholar
Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).
Google Scholar
MetaHIT Consortium. et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 834–841 (2014).
Google Scholar
MetaHIT Consortium (additional members). et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473, 174–180 (2011).
MetaHIT consortium. et al. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature 528, 262–266 (2015).
Google Scholar
McDonald, D. et al. American gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 3, e00031–18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lopera-Maya, E. A. et al. Effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome in 7,738 participants of the Dutch Microbiome Project. Nat. Genet. 54, 143–151 (2022).
Google Scholar
López-Otín, C. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of Health. Cell 184, 33–63 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schmauck-Medina, T. et al. New hallmarks of ageing: a 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting summary. Aging 14, 6829–6839 (2022).
Google Scholar
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. K. et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 336, 1262–1267 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cho, I. & Blaser, M. J. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 260–270 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. A. et al. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 24, 392–400 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rackaityte, E. & Lynch, S. V. The human microbiome in the 21st century. Nat. Commun. 11, 5256 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cani, P. D. Human gut microbiome: hopes, threats and promises. Gut 67, 1716–1725 (2018).
Google Scholar
de Vos, W. M., Tilg, H., Van Hul, M. & Cani, P. D. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut 71, 1020–1032 (2022).
Google Scholar
Clemente, J. C., Ursell, L. K., Parfrey, L. W. & Knight, R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell 148, 1258–1270 (2012).
Google Scholar
Brodin, P. Immune-microbe interactions early in life: a determinant of health and disease long term. Science 376, 945–950 (2022).
Google Scholar
McFall-Ngai, M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 3229–3236 (2013).
Google Scholar
Valdes, A. M., Walter, J., Segal, E. & Spector, T. D. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ 361, k2179 (2018).
Lynch, S. V. & Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2369–2379 (2016).
Google Scholar
Martino, C. et al. Microbiota succession throughout life from the cradle to the grave. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 707–720 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. A. et al. Microbiome-wide association studies link dynamic microbial consortia to disease. Nature 535, 94–103 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ayres, J. S. Cooperative microbial tolerance behaviors in host-microbiota mutualism. Cell 165, 1323–1331 (2016).
Google Scholar
Clemente, J. C., Manasson, J. & Scher, J. U. The role of the gut microbiome in systemic inflammatory disease. BMJ 360, j5145 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, J.-Y., Tsolis, R. M. & Bäumler, A. J. The microbiome and gut homeostasis. Science 377, eabp9960 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. S. B., Raes, J. & Bork, P. The human gut microbiome: from association to modulation. Cell 172, 1198–1215 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bäckhed, F., Ley, R. E., Sonnenburg, J. L., Peterson, D. A. & Gordon, J. I. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 307, 1915–1920 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bordenstein, S. R. & Theis, K. R. Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002226 (2015).
Google Scholar
The Superorganism. in Biophilia 23–38 (Harvard University Press, 1984). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231-003.
Bell, G. Model metaorganism. Science 282, 248–248 (1998).
Google Scholar
Theis, K. R. et al. Getting the hologenome concept right: an eco-evolutionary framework for hosts and their microbiomes. mSystems 1, e00028–16 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. & Hazen, S. L. The gut microbial endocrine organ: bacterially derived signals driving cardiometabolic diseases. Annu. Rev. Med. 66, 343–359 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bach, J.-F. The hygiene hypothesis in autoimmunity: the role of pathogens and commensals. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 105–120 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rook, G. A. W. A Darwinian View of the Hygiene or “Old Friends” Hypothesis: When urban living reduced contacts of humans with microbes and worms, it increased our risk for chronic inflammatory disorders. Microbe Mag. 7, 173–180 (2012).
Noverr, M. C. & Huffnagle, G. B. The ‘microflora hypothesis’ of allergic diseases. Clin. Exp. Allergy 35, 1511–1520 (2005).
Google Scholar
Quagliariello, A. et al. Ancient oral microbiomes support gradual Neolithic dietary shifts towards agriculture. Nat. Commun. 13, 6927 (2022).
Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. A. et al. Codiversification of gut microbiota with humans. Science 377, 1328–1332 (2022).
Google Scholar
Moeller, A. H. et al. Cospeciation of gut microbiota with hominids. Science 353, 380–382 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rook, G., Bäckhed, F., Levin, B. R., McFall-Ngai, M. J. & McLean, A. R. Evolution, human-microbe interactions, and life history plasticity. Lancet 390, 521–530 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sharp, C. & Foster, K. R. Host control and the evolution of cooperation in host microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 13, 3567 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hector, T. E., Hoang, K. L., Li, J. & King, K. C. Symbiosis and host responses to heating. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 611–624 (2022).
Google Scholar
Frazão, N. et al. Two modes of evolution shape bacterial strain diversity in the mammalian gut for thousands of generations. Nat. Commun. 13, 5604 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ley, R. E. et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320, 1647–1651 (2008).
Google Scholar
Davenport, E. R. et al. The human microbiome in evolution. BMC Biol. 15, 127 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barreto, H. C. & Gordo, I. Intrahost evolution of the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 590–603 (2023).
The NIH HMP Working Group. et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 19, 2317–2323 (2009).
Google Scholar
Koren, O. et al. Human oral, gut, and plaque microbiota in patients with atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 4592–4598 (2011).
Google Scholar
Clifford, A. & Hoffman, G. S. Evidence for a vascular microbiome and its role in vessel health and disease. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 27, 397–405 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hidi, L. et al. Human blood vessel microbiota in healthy adults based on common femoral arteries of brain-dead multi-organ donors. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12, 1056319 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tan, C. C. S. et al. No evidence for a common blood microbiome based on a population study of 9770 healthy humans. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 973–985 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lu, L. J. & Liu, J. Human microbiota and ophthalmic disease. Yale J. Biol. Med. 89, 325–330 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ozkan, J. et al. Biogeography of the human ocular microbiota. Ocul. Surf. 17, 111–118 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lyon, J. Even the eye has a microbiome. JAMA 318, 689 (2017).
Google Scholar
St. Leger, A. J. et al. An ocular commensal protects against corneal infection by driving an interleukin-17 response from mucosal γδ t cells. Immunity 47, 148–158.e5 (2017).
Google Scholar
Castellani, G., Croese, T., Peralta Ramos, J. M. & Schwartz, M. Transforming the understanding of brain immunity. Science 380, eabo7649 (2023).
Google Scholar
Servick, K. Do gut bacteria make a second home in our brains? Science (2018).
Link, C. D. Is there a brain microbiome? Neurosci. Insights 16, 263310552110187 (2021).
Google Scholar
Molinero, N. et al. The human gallbladder microbiome is related to the physiological state and the biliary metabolic profile. Microbiome 7, 100 (2019).
Google Scholar
Urbaniak, C. et al. Microbiota of human breast tissue. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3007–3014 (2014).
Google Scholar
De Goffau, M. C. et al. Human placenta has no microbiome but can contain potential pathogens. Nature 572, 329–334 (2019).
Google Scholar
Younge, N. et al. Fetal exposure to the maternal microbiota in humans and mice. JCI Insight 4, e127806 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hornef, M. & Penders, J. Does a prenatal bacterial microbiota exist? Mucosal Immunol. 10, 598–601 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mishra, A. et al. Microbial exposure during early human development primes fetal immune cells. Cell 184, 3394–3409.e20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Perez-Muñoz, M. E., Arrieta, M.-C., Ramer-Tait, A. E. & Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 5, 48 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kennedy, K. M. et al. Fetal meconium does not have a detectable microbiota before birth. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 865–873 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kennedy, K. M. et al. Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. Nature 613, 639–649 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 11971–11975 (2010).
Google Scholar
Faith, J. J. et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science 341, 1237439 (2013).
Google Scholar
Liang, G. & Bushman, F. D. The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 514–527 (2021).
Google Scholar
McCallum, G. & Tropini, C. The gut microbiota and its biogeography. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 105–118 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yassour, M. et al. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci. Transl. Med. 8 (2016).
Odamaki, T. et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 16, 90 (2016).
Google Scholar
Folz, J. et al. Human metabolome variation along the upper intestinal tract. Nat. Metab. 5, 777–788 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shalon, D. et al. Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions. Nature 617, 581–591 (2023).
Google Scholar
She, J.-J. et al. Defining the biogeographical map and potential bacterial translocation of microbiome in human ‘surface organs’. Nat. Commun. 15, 427 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mason, M. R., Chambers, S., Dabdoub, S. M., Thikkurissy, S. & Kumar, P. S. Characterizing oral microbial communities across dentition states and colonization niches. Microbiome 6, 67 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sampaio-Maia, B. & Monteiro-Silva, F. Acquisition and maturation of oral microbiome throughout childhood: an update. Dent. Res. J. 11, 291–301 (2014).
Dzidic, M. et al. Oral microbiome development during childhood: an ecological succession influenced by postnatal factors and associated with tooth decay. ISME J. 12, 2292–2306 (2018).
Google Scholar
Merglova, V. & Polenik, P. Early colonization of the oral cavity in 6- and 12-month-old infants by cariogenic and periodontal pathogens: a case-control study. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 61, 423–429 (2016).
Google Scholar
Crielaard, W. et al. Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various developmental stages of their dentition in the relation to their oral health. BMC Med. Genomics 4, 22 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ruan, X., Luo, J., Zhang, P. & Howell, K. The salivary microbiome shows a high prevalence of core bacterial members yet variability across human populations. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 85 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gaitanis, G. et al. Variation of cultured skin microbiota in mothers and their infants during the first year postpartum. Pediatr. Dermatol. 36, 460–465 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chu, D. M. et al. Maturation of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple body sites and in relation to mode of delivery. Nat. Med. 23, 314–326 (2017).
Google Scholar
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. et al. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514, 59–64 (2014).
Google Scholar
Saheb Kashaf, S. et al. Integrating cultivation and metagenomics for a multi-kingdom view of skin microbiome diversity and functions. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 169–179 (2021).
Google Scholar
Harris-Tryon, T. A. & Grice, E. A. Microbiota and maintenance of skin barrier function. Science 376, 940–945 (2022).
Google Scholar
Byrd, A. L., Belkaid, Y. & Segre, J. A. The human skin microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 143–155 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yildirim, S. et al. Primate vaginal microbiomes exhibit species specificity without universal Lactobacillus dominance. ISME J. 8, 2431–2444 (2014).
Google Scholar
Łaniewski, P. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Connecting microbiome and menopause for healthy ageing. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 354–358 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reid, G. Therapeutic Opportunities in the Vaginal Microbiome. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, 5.3.06 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gliniewicz, K. et al. Comparison of the Vaginal Microbiomes of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women. Front. Microbiol. 10, 193 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brotman, R. M. et al. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 21, 450–458 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hillier, S. L. & Lau, R. J. Vaginal microflora in postmenopausal women who have not received estrogen replacement therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25, S123–S126 (1997).
Google Scholar
Ravel, J. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4680–4687 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X. et al. The vaginal bacterial communities of Japanese women resemble those of women in other racial groups. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 58, 169–181 (2010).
Google Scholar
Shi, Y., Chen, L., Tong, J. & Xu, C. Preliminary characterization of vaginal microbiota in healthy Chinese women using cultivation‐independent methods. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 35, 525–532 (2009).
Google Scholar
France, M. T. et al. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome 8, 166 (2020).
Google Scholar
Marconi, C. et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age from 5 regions in Brazil. Sex. Transm. Dis. 47, 562–569 (2020).
Google Scholar
Borgdorff, H. et al. The association between ethnicity and vaginal microbiota composition in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 12, e0181135 (2017).
Google Scholar
France, M., Alizadeh, M., Brown, S., Ma, B. & Ravel, J. Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 367–378 (2022).
Google Scholar
Muliyil, S. Linking the vaginal microbiome to women’s health. Nat. Med. (2023).
Lebeer, S. et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2183–2195 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kumpitsch, C., Koskinen, K., Schöpf, V. & Moissl-Eichinger, C. The microbiome of the upper respiratory tract in health and disease. BMC Biol. 17, 87 (2019).
Google Scholar
Natalini, J. G., Singh, S. & Segal, L. N. The dynamic lung microbiome in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 222–235 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pattaroni, C. et al. Early-life formation of the microbial and immunological environment of the human airways. Cell Host Microbe 24, 857–865.e4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, R., Li, J. & Zhou, X. Lung microbiome: new insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 19 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wypych, T. P., Wickramasinghe, L. C. & Marsland, B. J. The influence of the microbiome on respiratory health. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1279–1290 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. The long-term genetic stability and individual specificity of the human gut microbiome. Cell 184, 2302–2315.e12 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489, 220–230 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fassarella, M. et al. Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. Gut 70, 595–605 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sommer, F., Anderson, J. M., Bharti, R., Raes, J. & Rosenstiel, P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 630–638 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X. et al. Longitudinal profiling of the microbiome at four body sites reveals core stability and individualized dynamics during health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 32, 506–526.e9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Huang, S. et al. Human skin, oral, and gut microbiomes predict chronological age. mSystems 5, e00630–19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. MIAOME: Human microbiome affect the host epigenome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20, 2455–2463 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kapil, V. et al. The noncanonical pathway for in vivo nitric oxide generation: the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway. Pharmacol. Rev. 72, 692–766 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, J. O., Weitzberg, E. & Gladwin, M. T. The nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 156–167 (2008).
Google Scholar
Chai, X., Liu, L. & Chen, F. Oral nitrate-reducing bacteria as potential probiotics for blood pressure homeostasis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 11, 1337281 (2024).
Google Scholar
Doel, J. J., Benjamin, N., Hector, M. P., Rogers, M. & Allaker, R. P. Evaluation of bacterial nitrate reduction in the human oral cavity. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 113, 14–19 (2005).
Google Scholar
Goh, C. E. et al. Nitrite generating and depleting capacity of the oral microbiome and cardiometabolic risk: results from ORIGINS. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 11, e023038 (2022).
Google Scholar
Blekkenhorst, L. C. et al. Nitrate, the oral microbiome, and cardiovascular health: a systematic literature review of human and animal studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 107, 504–522 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kapil, V. et al. Physiological role for nitrate-reducing oral bacteria in blood pressure control. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 55, 93–100 (2013).
Google Scholar
Krautkramer, K. A., Fan, J. & Bäckhed, F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 77–94 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sommer, F. & Bäckhed, F. The gut microbiota—masters of host development and physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 227–238 (2013).
Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. & Allen-Vercoe, E. Macronutrient metabolism by the human gut microbiome: major fermentation by-products and their impact on host health. Microbiome 7, 91 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. & Round, J. L. SnapShot: Microbiota effects on host physiology. Cell 184, 2796–2796.e1 (2021).
Google Scholar
Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. & Bäckhed, F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cummings, J. H., Pomare, E. W., Branch, W. J., Naylor, C. P. & Macfarlane, G. T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut 28, 1221–1227 (1987).
Google Scholar
Beynen, A. C., Buechler, K. F., Van Der Molen, A. J. & Geelen, M. J. H. The effects of lactate and acetate on fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis by isolated rat hepatocytes. Int. J. Biochem. 14, 165–169 (1982).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, H., Ishii, M. & Akagawa, M. Propionate suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis via GPR43/AMPK signaling pathway. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 672, 108057 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, G. Y. et al. Propionate promotes gluconeogenesis by regulating mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in calf hepatocytes. Anim. Nutr. 15, 88–98 (2023).
Google Scholar
Demigné, C. et al. Effect of propionate on fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis and on acetate metabolism in isolated rat hepatocytes. Br. J. Nutr. 74, 209–219 (1995).
Google Scholar
Chambers, E. S. et al. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut 64, 1744–1754 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. Butyrate reduces appetite and activates brown adipose tissue via the gut-brain neural circuit. Gut 67, 1269–1279 (2018).
Google Scholar
Trompette, A. et al. Gut-derived short-chain fatty acids modulate skin barrier integrity by promoting keratinocyte metabolism and differentiation. Mucosal Immunol. 15, 908–926 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jangi, S. et al. Microbial butyrate capacity is reduced in inflamed mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis. Sci. Rep. 14, 3479 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kang, X. et al. Roseburia intestinalis generated butyrate boosts anti-PD-1 efficacy in colorectal cancer by activating cytotoxic CD8 + T cells. Gut 72, 2112–2122 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Tao, Y., Gu, Y. & Ma, Q. Butyrate facilitates immune clearance of colorectal cancer cells by suppressing STAT1-mediated PD-L1 expression. Clinics 78, 100303 (2023).
Google Scholar
Okumura, S. et al. Gut bacteria identified in colorectal cancer patients promote tumourigenesis via butyrate secretion. Nat. Commun. 12, 5674 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wahlström, A., Sayin, S. I., Marschall, H.-U. & Bäckhed, F. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab. 24, 41–50 (2016).
Google Scholar
Collins, S. L., Stine, J. G., Bisanz, J. E., Okafor, C. D. & Patterson, A. D. Bile acids and the gut microbiota: metabolic interactions and impacts on disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 236–247 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fogelson, K. A., Dorrestein, P. C., Zarrinpar, A. & Knight, R. The gut microbial bile acid modulation and its relevance to digestive health and diseases. Gastroenterology 164, 1069–1085 (2023).
Xie, S. et al. Novel tripeptide RKH derived from Akkermansia muciniphila protects against lethal sepsis. Gut 73, 78–91 (2023).
Jiang, J. et al. The gut metabolite indole-3-propionic acid activates ERK1 to restore social function and hippocampal inhibitory synaptic transmission in a 16p11.2 microdeletion mouse model. Microbiome 12, 66 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhao, M. et al. Gut bacteria-driven homovanillic acid alleviates depression by modulating synaptic integrity. Cell Metab. 36, 1000–1012.e6 (2024).
Google Scholar
Enamorado, M. et al. Immunity to the microbiota promotes sensory neuron regeneration. Cell 186, 607–620.e17 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hosang, L. et al. The lung microbiome regulates brain autoimmunity. Nature 603, 138–144 (2022).
Google Scholar
Oh, E. S. & Petronis, A. Origins of human disease: the chrono-epigenetic perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 533–546 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carter, B. & Zhao, K. The epigenetic basis of cellular heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 235–250 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fitz-James, M. H. & Cavalli, G. Molecular mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 325–341 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cavalli, G. & Heard, E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature 571, 489–499 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pepke, M. L., Hansen, S. B. & Limborg, M. T. Unraveling host regulation of gut microbiota through the epigenome–microbiome axis. Trends Microbiol. (2024) (2024).
Ansari, I. et al. The microbiota programs DNA methylation to control intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 610–619 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mattei, A. L., Bailly, N. & Meissner, A. DNA methylation: a historical perspective. Trends Genet 38, 676–707 (2022).
Google Scholar
Crider, K. S., Yang, T. P., Berry, R. J. & Bailey, L. B. Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for Folate’s role. Adv. Nutr. 3, 21–38 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bannister, A. J. & Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 21, 381–395 (2011).
Google Scholar
Millán-Zambrano, G., Burton, A., Bannister, A. J. & Schneider, R. Histone post-translational modifications—cause and consequence of genome function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 563–580 (2022).
Google Scholar
Furusawa, Y. et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 504, 446–450 (2013).
Google Scholar
Davison, J. M. et al. Microbiota regulate intestinal epithelial gene expression by suppressing the transcription factor Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha. Genome Res. 27, 1195–1206 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mattick, J. S. et al. Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 430–447 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nemeth, K., Bayraktar, R., Ferracin, M. & Calin, G. A. Non-coding RNAs in disease: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 211–232 (2024).
Google Scholar
Virtue, A. T. et al. The gut microbiota regulates white adipose tissue inflammation and obesity via a family of microRNAs. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav1892 (2019).
Google Scholar
Statello, L., Guo, C.-J., Chen, L.-L. & Huarte, M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 96–118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liang, L., Ai, L., Qian, J., Fang, J.-Y. & Xu, J. Long noncoding RNA expression profiles in gut tissues constitute molecular signatures that reflect the types of microbes. Sci. Rep. 5, 11763 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bach, J.-F. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 911–920 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ege, M. J. et al. Exposure to environmental microorganisms and childhood asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 701–709 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kuehni, C. E., Strippoli, M. F., Low, N. & Silverman, M. Asthma in young South Asian women living in the United Kingdom: the importance of early life. Clin. Exp. Allergy 37, 47–53 (2007).
Google Scholar
Feltbower, R. G. et al. Trends in the incidence of childhood diabetes in South Asians and other children in Bradford, UK. Diabet. Med. 19, 162–166 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bodansky, H. J., Staines, A., Stephenson, C., Haigh, D. & Cartwright, R. Evidence for an environmental effect in the aetiology of insulin dependent diabetes in a transmigratory population. BMJ 304, 1020–1022 (1992).
Google Scholar
Dean, G. & Elian, M. Age at immigration to England of Asian and Caribbean immigrants and the risk of developing multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 63, 565–568 (1997).
Google Scholar
Gale, C. R. & Martyn, C. N. Migrant studies in multiple sclerosis. Prog. Neurobiol. 47, 425–448 (1995).
Google Scholar
Strachan, D. P. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ 299, 1259–1260 (1989).
Google Scholar
Strachan, D. Family size, infection and atopy: the first decade of the ‘hygiene hypothesis’. Thorax 55, 2S–10S (2000).
Google Scholar
Finlay, B. B. et al. The hygiene hypothesis, the COVID pandemic, and consequences for the human microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2010217118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Parker, W. The ‘hygiene hypothesis’ for allergic disease is a misnomer. BMJ 349, g5267–g5267 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rook, G. A. W. et al. Mycobacteria and other environmental organisms as immunomodulators for immunoregulatory disorders. Springe. Semin. Immunopathol. 25, 237–255 (2004).
Google Scholar
Rook, G. A. W. Microbes, immunoregulation, and the gut. Gut 54, 317–320 (2005).
Google Scholar
Donald, K. & Finlay, B. B. Early-life interactions between the microbiota and immune system: impact on immune system development and atopic disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 23, 735–748 (2023).
Van Der Waaij, D., Berghuis-de Vries, J. M. & Lekkerkerk-van Der Wees, J. E. C. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 69, 405–411 (1971).
Google Scholar
Caballero-Flores, G., Pickard, J. M. & Núñez, G. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance: mechanisms and regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 347–360. (2022).
Bohnhoff, M. & Miller, C. P. Enhanced susceptibility to salmonella infection in streptomycin-treated mice*. J. Infect. Dis. 111, 117–127 (1962).
Google Scholar
Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).
Google Scholar
Blaser, M. J. Antibiotic use and its consequences for the normal microbiome. Science 352, 544–545 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lee, S. M. et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature 501, 426–429 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tanzer, J. M., Kurasz, A. B. & Clive, J. Competitive displacement of mutans streptococci and inhibition of tooth decay by Streptococcus salivarius TOVE-R. Infect. Immun. 48, 44–50 (1985).
Google Scholar
Van Hoogmoed, C. G. et al. Reduction of periodontal pathogens adhesion by antagonistic strains. Oral. Microbiol. Immunol. 23, 43–48 (2008).
Google Scholar
Zipperer, A. et al. Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization. Nature 535, 511–516 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sugimoto, S. et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis esp degrades specific proteins associated with staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host-pathogen interaction. J. Bacteriol. 195, 1645–1655 (2013).
Google Scholar
Torres Salazar, B. O. et al. Commensal production of a broad-spectrum and short-lived antimicrobial peptide polyene eliminates nasal Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 200–213 (2023).
Google Scholar
King, A. M. et al. Systematic mining of the human microbiome identifies antimicrobial peptides with diverse activity spectra. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2420–2434 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shin, R., Suzuki, M. & Morishita, Y. Influence of intestinal anaerobes and organic acids on the growth of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Med. Microbiol. 51, 201–206 (2002).
Google Scholar
Rolfe, R. D. Role of volatile fatty acids in colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 45, 185–191 (1984).
Google Scholar
Bohnhoff, M., Miller, C. P. & Martin, W. R. Resistance of the mouse’s intestinal tract to experimental Salmonella infection. J. Exp. Med. 120, 805–816 (1964).
Google Scholar
Buffie, C. G. et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517, 205–208 (2015).
Google Scholar
Aoki, S. K. et al. Contact-dependent inhibition of growth in Escherichia coli. Science 309, 1245–1248 (2005).
Google Scholar
Aoki, S. K. et al. A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria. Nature 468, 439–442 (2010).
Google Scholar
Flaugnatti, N. et al. Human commensal gut Proteobacteria withstand type VI secretion attacks through immunity protein-independent mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 12, 5751 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ross, B. D. et al. Human gut bacteria contain acquired interbacterial defence systems. Nature 575, 224–228 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chatzidaki-Livanis, M., Geva-Zatorsky, N. & Comstock, L. E. Bacteroides fragilis type VI secretion systems use novel effector and immunity proteins to antagonize human gut Bacteroidales species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 3627–3632 (2016).
Google Scholar
Russell, A. B. et al. A type VI secretion-related pathway in bacteroidetes mediates interbacterial antagonism. Cell Host Microbe 16, 227–236 (2014).
Google Scholar
Voravuthikunchai, S. P., Bilasoi, S. & Supamala, O. Antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria by human vaginal lactobacilli. Anaerobe 12, 221–226 (2006).
Google Scholar
Turovskiy, Y., Sutyak Noll, K. & Chikindas, M. L. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis: aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110, 1105–1128 (2011).
Google Scholar
Osbelt, L. et al. Klebsiella oxytoca inhibits Salmonella infection through multiple microbiota-context-dependent mechanisms. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 1792–1811 (2024).
Stekel, D. First report of antimicrobial resistance pre-dates penicillin. Nature 562, 192–192 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. I., Truman, A. W. & Wilkinson, B. Antibiotics: past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 51, 72–80 (2019).
Google Scholar
Varadan, S. R. et al. A just transition for antimicrobial resistance: planning for an equitable and sustainable future with antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 403, 2766–2767 (2023).
Kimura, I. et al. Maternal gut microbiota in pregnancy influences offspring metabolic phenotype in mice. Science 367, eaaw8429 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vuong, H. E. et al. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature 586, 281–286 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, Z. et al. Revealing the importance of prenatal gut microbiome in offspring neurodevelopment in humans. eBioMedicine 90, 104491 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gomez de Agüero, M. et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science 351, 1296–1302 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bogaert, D. et al. Mother-to-infant microbiota transmission and infant microbiota development across multiple body sites. Cell Host Microbe 31, 447–460.e6 (2023).
Google Scholar
Selma-Royo, M. et al. Birthmode and environment-dependent microbiota transmission dynamics are complemented by breastfeeding during the first year. Cell Host Microbe 32, 996–1010.e4 (2024).
Google Scholar
Paredes, A. et al. γ-Linolenic acid in maternal milk drives cardiac metabolic maturation. Nature 618, 365–373 (2023).
Google Scholar
Caballero-Flores, G. et al. Maternal immunization confers protection to the offspring against an attaching and effacing pathogen through delivery of IgG in breast milk. Cell Host Microbe 25, 313–323.e4 (2019).
Google Scholar
Atyeo, C. & Alter, G. The multifaceted roles of breast milk antibodies. Cell 184, 1486–1499 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhong, Z. et al. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Probio-M8 undergoes host adaptive evolution by glcU mutation and translocates to the infant’s gut via oral-/entero-mammary routes through lactation. Microbiome 10, 197 (2022).
Google Scholar
Barnett, D. J. M. et al. Human milk oligosaccharides, antimicrobial drugs, and the gut microbiota of term neonates: observations from the KOALA birth cohort study. Gut Microbes 15, 2164152 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cheung, K. Y. et al. Health and nutrition claims for infant formula: International Cross Sectional Survey. BMJ 380, e071075 (2023).
Baumann-Dudenhoeffer, A. M., D’Souza, A. W., Tarr, P. I., Warner, B. B. & Dantas, G. Infant diet and maternal gestational weight gain predict early metabolic maturation of gut microbiomes. Nat. Med. 24, 1822–1829 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mills, D. A., German, J. B., Lebrilla, C. B. & Underwood, M. A. Translating neonatal microbiome science into commercial innovation: metabolism of human milk oligosaccharides as a basis for probiotic efficacy in breast-fed infants. Gut Microbes 15, 2192458 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Escamilla, R. et al. Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. Lancet 401, 472–485 (2023).
Google Scholar
Baker, P. et al. The political economy of infant and young child feeding: confronting corporate power, overcoming structural barriers, and accelerating progress. Lancet 401, 503–524 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stinson, L. F. & Geddes, D. T. Microbial metabolites: the next frontier in human milk. Trends Microbiol. 30, 408–410 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dubois, L. et al. Paternal and induced gut microbiota seeding complement mother-to-infant transmission. Cell Host Microbe 32, 1011–1024.e4 (2024).
Google Scholar
Argaw-Denboba, A. et al. Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness. Nature 629, 652–659 (2024).
Lawrence, R. J. David the ‘bubble boy’ and the boundaries of the human. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 253, 74 (1985).
Google Scholar
Williams, S. C. P. Gnotobiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 1661–1661 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wostmann, B. S. The GERMFREE animal in nutritional studies. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1, 257–279 (1981).
Google Scholar
Basic, M. & Bleich, A. Gnotobiotics: past, present and future. Lab. Anim. 53, 232–243 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fiebiger, U., Bereswill, S. & Heimesaat, M. M. Dissecting the interplay between intestinal microbiota and host immunity in health and disease: Lessons learned from germfree and gnotobiotic animal models. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 6, 253–271 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schwarzer, M. et al. Lactobacillus plantarum strain maintains growth of infant mice during chronic undernutrition. Science 351, 854–857 (2016).
Google Scholar
Edwards, J. M. et al. Microbiota are critical for vascular physiology: Germ-free status weakens contractility and induces sex-specific vascular remodeling in mice. Vasc. Pharmacol. 125–126, 106633 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gordon, H. A., Wostmann, B. S. & Bruckner-Kardoss, E. Effects of microbial flora on cardiac output and other elements of blood circulation. Exp. Biol. Med. 114, 301–304 (1963).
Google Scholar
Zhou, D. et al. Microbiota modulates cardiac transcriptional responses to intermittent hypoxia and hypercapnia. Front. Physiol. 12, 680275 (2021).
Google Scholar
Crawford, P. A. et al. Regulation of myocardial ketone body metabolism by the gut microbiota during nutrient deprivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 11276–11281 (2009).
Google Scholar
Jain, R., Waldvogel‐Thurlow, S., Darveau, R. & Douglas, R. Differences in the paranasal sinuses between germ‐free and pathogen‐free mice. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 6, 631–637 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yun, Y. et al. Environmentally determined differences in the murine lung microbiota and their relation to alveolar architecture. PLoS ONE 9, e113466 (2014).
Google Scholar
Woodward, B. A Study of the influence of the ambient microflora on the structure of lung alveolar macrophages and an ultrastructural comparison of lung and peritoneal macrophages in germ‐free and conventionally reared mice. J. Morphol. 169, 283–291 (1981).
Google Scholar
Dolma, K. et al. Effects of hyperoxia on alveolar and pulmonary vascular development in germ-free mice. Am. J. Physiol. -Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 318, L421–L428 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ashley, S. L. et al. Lung and gut microbiota are altered by hyperoxia and contribute to oxygen-induced lung injury in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaau9959 (2020).
Wostmann, B. S. Germfree and Gnotobiotic Animal Models: Background and Applications. (CRC Press, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780138753320.
Al-Asmakh, M. & Zadjali, F. Use of germ-free animal models in microbiota-related research. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 1583–1588 (2015).
Google Scholar
Geissinger, H. D. & Abandowitz, H. M. Scanning electron and light microscopy of the cecum of germ-free and conventional mice. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 96, 254 (1977).
Google Scholar
Khoury, K. A., Floch, M. H. & Hersh, T. Small intestinal mucosal cell proliferation and bacterial flora in the conventionalization of the germfree mouse. J. Exp. Med. 130, 659–670 (1969).
Google Scholar
Bolsega, S. et al. The genetic background is shaping cecal enlargement in the absence of intestinal microbiota. Nutrients 15, 636 (2023).
Google Scholar
Loesche, W. J. Accumulation of endogenous carbohydrate-containing compounds in the cecum of the germfree rat. Exp. Biol. Med. 131, 387–392 (1969).
Google Scholar
McVey Neufeld, K. A., Perez‐Burgos, A., Mao, Y. K., Bienenstock, J. & Kunze, W. A. The gut microbiome restores intrinsic and extrinsic nerve function in germ‐free mice accompanied by changes in calbindin. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 27, 627–636 (2015).
Google Scholar
McVey Neufeld, K. A., Mao, Y. K., Bienenstock, J., Foster, J. A. & Kunze, W. A. The microbiome is essential for normal gut intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability in the mouse. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 25, 183 (2013).
Google Scholar
Touw, K. et al. Mutual reinforcement of pathophysiological host‐microbe interactions in intestinal stasis models. Physiol. Rep. 5, e13182 (2017).
Google Scholar
Niimi, K. & Takahashi, E. New system to examine the activity and water and food intake of germ-free mice in a sealed positive-pressure cage. Heliyon 5, e02176 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jervis, H. R. & Biggers, D. C. Mucosal enzymes in the cecum of conventional and germfree mice. Anat. Rec. 148, 591–597 (1964).
Google Scholar
Sumi, Y., Miyakawa, M., Kanzaki, M. & Kotake, Y. Vitamin B-6 deficiency in germfree rats. J. Nutr. 107, 1707–1714 (1977).
Google Scholar
Ikeda, M. et al. The differences of the metabolism related to vitamin B6-dependent enzymes among vitamin B6-deficient germ-free and conventional rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 25, 131–139 (1979).
Google Scholar
Hirayama, K., Uetsuka, K., Kuwabara, Y., Tamura, M. & Itoh, K. Vitamin K deficiency of germfree mice caused by feeding standard purified diet sterilized by.GAMMA.-irradiation. Exp. Anim. 56, 273–278 (2007).
Google Scholar
Mishima, E. et al. Germ-free conditions modulate host purine metabolism, exacerbating adenine-induced kidney damage. Toxins 12, 547 (2020).
Google Scholar
Koopman, J. P. in Encyclopedia of Immunology 990–992 (Elsevier, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/rwei.1999.0256.
Hoces, D. et al. Metabolic reconstitution of germ-free mice by a gnotobiotic microbiota varies over the circadian cycle. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001743 (2022).
Google Scholar
Weger, B. D. et al. The mouse microbiome is required for sex-specific diurnal rhythms of gene expression and metabolism. Cell Metab. 29, 362–382.e8 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sharma, S. P. & Suk, K. T. Microbial influence on liver regeneration: understanding gut microbiota and hepatic recovery post partial hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 13, 314–316 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Jiang, N., Xiao, Y., Yuan, K. & Wang, Z. The role of gut microbiota in liver regeneration. Front. Immunol. 13, 1003376 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kennedy, E. A., King, K. Y. & Baldridge, M. T. Mouse microbiota models: comparing germ-free mice and antibiotics treatment as tools for modifying gut bacteria. Front. Physiol. 9, 1534 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wostmann, B. S., Pleasants, J. R., Bealmear, P. & Kincade, P. W. Serum proteins and lymphoid tissues in germ-free mice fed a chemically defined, water soluble, low molecular weight diet. Immunology 19, 443–448 (1970).
Google Scholar
Jung, C., Hugot, J.-P. & Barreau, F. Peyer’s patches: the immune sensors of the intestine. Int. J. Inflamm. 2010, 1–12 (2010).
Google Scholar
Konjar, Š., Ferreira, C., Blankenhaus, B. & Veldhoen, M. Intestinal barrier interactions with specialized CD8 T cells. Front. Immunol. 8, 1281 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ivanov, I. I. et al. Induction of Intestinal Th17. Cells Segmented Filamentous Bact. Cell 139, 485–498 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schoenborn, A. A. et al. The enteric microbiota regulates jejunal Paneth cell number and function without impacting intestinal stem cells. Gut Microbes 10, 45–58 (2019).
Google Scholar
Macpherson, A. J., McCoy, K. D., Johansen, F.-E. & Brandtzaeg, P. The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol. 1, 11–22 (2008).
Google Scholar
Round, J. L. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 313–323 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zaph, C. et al. Commensal-dependent expression of IL-25 regulates the IL-23–IL-17 axis in the intestine. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2191–2198 (2008).
Google Scholar
Sprinz, H. et al. The response of the germfree guinea pig to oral bacterial challenge with Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. Am. J. Pathol. 39, 681–695 (1961).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. Sjögren-like lacrimal keratoconjunctivitis in germ-free mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 565 (2018).
Google Scholar
Braniste, V. et al. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 6 (2014).
Lu, J. et al. Microbiota influence the development of the brain and behaviors in C57BL/6J mice. PLoS ONE 13, e0201829 (2018).
Google Scholar
Luczynski, P. et al. Adult microbiota‐deficient mice have distinct dendritic morphological changes: differential effects in the amygdala and hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 44, 2654–2666 (2016).
Google Scholar
Luczynski, P. et al. Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, pyw020 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cescon, M. et al. Gut microbiota depletion delays somatic peripheral nerve development and impairs neuromuscular junction maturation. Gut Microbes 16, 2363015 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mai, H. et al. Whole-body cellular mapping in mouse using standard IgG antibodies. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 617–627. (2023).
De Vadder, F. et al. Gut microbiota regulates maturation of the adult enteric nervous system via enteric serotonin networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 6458–6463 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kabouridis, P. S. et al. Microbiota controls the homeostasis of glial cells in the gut lamina propria. Neuron 85, 289–295 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. et al. Normalization of reproductive function in germfree mice following bacterial contamination. Exp. Anim. 47, 151–158 (1998).
Google Scholar
Al-Asmakh, M. et al. The gut microbiota and developmental programming of the testis in mice. PLoS ONE 9, e103809 (2014).
Google Scholar
Vahidi, G. et al. Germ‐free C57BL /6 mice have increased bone mass and altered matrix properties but not decreased bone fracture resistance. J. Bone Miner. Res. 38, 1154–1174 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ohlsson, C. et al. Regulation of bone mass by the gut microbiota is dependent on NOD1 and NOD2 signaling. Cell. Immunol. 317, 55–58 (2017).
Google Scholar
Czernik, P. J. et al. Reconstitution of the host holobiont in germ-free born male rats acutely increases bone growth and affects marrow cellular content. Physiol. Genomics 53, 518–533 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lahiri, S. et al. The gut microbiota influences skeletal muscle mass and function in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaan5662 (2019).
Google Scholar
Qiu, Y. et al. Depletion of gut microbiota induces skeletal muscle atrophy by FXR-FGF15/19 signalling. Ann. Med. 53, 508–522 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yan, H. et al. Gut microbiota can transfer fiber characteristics and lipid metabolic profiles of skeletal muscle from pigs to germ-free mice. Sci. Rep. 6, 31786 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bäckhed, F. et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 101, 15718–15723 (2004).
Google Scholar
Mestdagh, R. et al. Gut microbiota modulate the metabolism of brown adipose tissue in mice. J. Proteome Res. 11, 620–630 (2012).
Google Scholar
Suárez-Zamorano, N. et al. Microbiota depletion promotes browning of white adipose tissue and reduces obesity. Nat. Med. 21, 1497–1501 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bäckhed, F., Manchester, J. K., Semenkovich, C. F. & Gordon, J. I. Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 979–984 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. J. et al. Microbiota influences host exercise capacity via modulation of skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in mice. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 1820–1830 (2023).
Google Scholar
Uberoi, A. et al. Commensal microbiota regulates skin barrier function and repair via signaling through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1235–1248.e8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, G. et al. Bacteria induce skin regeneration via IL-1β signaling. Cell Host Microbe 29, 777–791.e6 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tazume, S. et al. Effects of germfree status and food restriction on longevity and growth of mice. Exp. Anim. 40, 517–522 (1991).
Google Scholar
Gordon, H. A., Bruckner-kardoss, E. & Wostmann, B. S. Aging in germ-free mice: life tables and lesions observed at natural death. J. Gerontol. 21, 380–387 (1966).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. A. & Neufeld, J. D. Life in a world without microbes. PLoS Biol. 12, e1002020 (2014).
Google Scholar
Olm, M. R. et al. Robust variation in infant gut microbiome assembly across a spectrum of lifestyles. Science 376, 1220–1223 (2022).
Google Scholar
Blaser, M. J. & Falkow, S. What are the consequences of the disappearing human microbiota? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 887–894 (2009).
Google Scholar
Clemente, J. C. et al. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500183 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sonnenburg, E. D. et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature 529, 212–215 (2016).
Google Scholar
Carter, M. M. et al. Ultra-deep sequencing of Hadza hunter-gatherers recovers vanishing gut microbes. Cell 186, 3111–3124.e13 (2023).
Wu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, D., Wong, A. C. N. & Wang, G.-H. Axenic and gnotobiotic insect technologies in research on host–microbiota interactions. Trends Microbiol. 31, 858–871 (2023).
Sagan, L. On the origin of mitosing cells. J. Theor. Biol. 14, 225–IN6 (1967).
Google Scholar
Moreira, D., Le Guyader, H. & Philippe, H. The origin of red algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405, 69–72 (2000).
Google Scholar
Fan, L. et al. Phylogenetic analyses with systematic taxon sampling show that mitochondria branch within Alphaproteobacteria. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1213–1219 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gogoi, J. et al. Switching a conflicted bacterial DTD-tRNA code is essential for the emergence of mitochondria. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj7307 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lederberg, J. Infectious History. Science 288, 287–293 (2000).
Google Scholar
Coale, T. H. et al. Nitrogen-fixing organelle in a marine alga. Science 384, 217–222 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boyd, B. M. et al. Stochasticity, determinism, and contingency shape genome evolution of endosymbiotic bacteria. Nat. Commun. 15, 4571 (2024).
Google Scholar
Baedke, J., Fábregas‐Tejeda, A. & Nieves Delgado, A. The holobiont concept before Margulis. J. Exp. Zool. B: Mol. Dev. Evol. 334, 149–155 (2020).
Google Scholar
Margulis, L. & Fester, R. Bellagio conference and book. Symbiosis as Source of Evolutionary Innovation: Speciation and Morphogenesis. Conference-June 25-30, 1989, Bellagio Conference Center, Italy. Symbiosis Phila. Pa 11, 93–101 (1991).
Google Scholar
Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature 449, 804–810 (2007).
Google Scholar
King, I. L. & Divangahi, M. Training the metaorganism: the microbial counterpart. Cell 184, 574–576 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gill, S. R. et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312, 1355–1359 (2006).
Google Scholar
Macpherson, A. J. Do the microbiota influence vaccines and protective immunity to pathogens?: issues of sovereignty, federalism, and points-testing in the prokaryotic and eukaryotic spaces of the host-microbial superorganism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10, a029363 (2018).
Google Scholar
Thaiss, C. A., Zeevi, D., Levy, M., Segal, E. & Elinav, E. A day in the life of the meta-organism: diurnal rhythms of the intestinal microbiome and its host. Gut Microbes 6, 137–142 (2015).
Google Scholar
Muegge, B. D. et al. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 332, 970–974 (2011).
Google Scholar
Segre, J. A. & Salafsky, N. Hominid superorganisms. Science 353, 350–351 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T. The superorganism revisited. BioScience 59, 702–705 (2009).
Google Scholar
Jefferson, R. Agriculture and the Third World. 1089446492 Bytes. (2019).
Rosenberg, E., Koren, O., Reshef, L., Efrony, R. & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 355–362 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zilber-Rosenberg, I. & Rosenberg, E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 723–735 (2008).
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, E. & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome 6, 78 (2018).
Google Scholar
Alberdi, A., Andersen, S. B., Limborg, M. T., Dunn, R. R. & Gilbert, M. T. P. Disentangling host–microbiota complexity through hologenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 281–297 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Commun. Biol. 1, 95 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rosado, P. M. et al. Marine probiotics: increasing coral resistance to bleaching through microbiome manipulation. ISME J. 13, 921–936 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dove, S. G., Brown, K. T., Van Den Heuvel, A., Chai, A. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Ocean warming and acidification uncouple calcification from calcifier biomass which accelerates coral reef decline. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 55 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vanwonterghem, I. & Webster, N. S. Coral reef microorganisms in a changing climate. iScience 23, 100972 (2020).
Google Scholar
Biget, M. et al. Evaluating the hologenome concept by analyzing the root-endosphere microbiota of chimeric plants. iScience 26, 106031 (2023).
Google Scholar
Suárez, J. & Triviño, V. What Is a hologenomic adaptation? emergent individuality and inter-identity in multispecies systems. Front. Psychol. 11, 187 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zepeda Mendoza, M. L. et al. Hologenomic adaptations underlying the evolution of sanguivory in the common vampire bat. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 659–668 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shigenobu, S., Watanabe, H., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y. & Ishikawa, H. Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS. Nature 407, 81–86 (2000).
Google Scholar
Hansen, A. K. & Moran, N. A. Aphid genome expression reveals host–symbiont cooperation in the production of amino acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 2849–2854 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bennett, G. M. & Moran, N. A. Heritable symbiosis: the advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, 10169–10176 (2015).
Google Scholar
Moran, N. A. Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 8627–8633 (2007).
Google Scholar
Lebreton, F. et al. Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 169, 849–861.e13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kutschera, U. Darwin–Wallace principle of natural selection. Nature 453, 27–27 (2008).
Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Extending the modern synthesis: the evolution of ecosystems. Nat. Preced. (2010).
Gardner, A. The genetical theory of multilevel selection. J. Evol. Biol. 28, 305–319 (2015).
Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. A. & Ley, R. E. The role of the microbiota in human genetic adaptation. Science 370, eaaz6827 (2020).
Google Scholar
Henry, L. P., Bruijning, M., Forsberg, S. K. G. & Ayroles, J. F. The microbiome extends host evolutionary potential. Nat. Commun. 12, 5141 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ferreiro, A., Crook, N., Gasparrini, A. J. & Dantas, G. Multiscale evolutionary dynamics of host-associated microbiomes. Cell 172, 1216–1227 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grice, E. A. & Segre, J. A. The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 13, 151–170 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Brain control of humoral immune responses amenable to behavioural modulation. Nature 581, 204–208 (2020).
Google Scholar
Akkaya, M., Kwak, K. & Pierce, S. K. B cell memory: building two walls of protection against pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 229–238 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jin, H., Li, M., Jeong, E., Castro-Martinez, F. & Zuker, C. S. A body–brain circuit that regulates body inflammatory responses. Nature 630, 695–703 (2024).
Nagashima, K. et al. Mapping the T cell repertoire to a complex gut bacterial community. Nature 621, 162–170 (2023).
Omenetti, S. et al. The intestine harbors functionally distinct homeostatic tissue-resident and inflammatory Th17 cells. Immunity 51, 77–89.e6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moor, K. et al. High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria. Nature 544, 498–502 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rollenske, T. et al. Parallelism of intestinal secretory IgA shapes functional microbial fitness. Nature 598, 657–661 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huus, K. E., Petersen, C. & Finlay, B. B. Diversity and dynamism of IgA−microbiota interactions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 514–525 (2021).
Google Scholar
Moreno-Sabater, A. et al. Intestinal Candida albicans overgrowth in IgA deficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 152, 748–759.e3. (2023).
Conrey, P. E. et al. IgA deficiency destabilizes homeostasis toward intestinal microbes and increases systemic immune dysregulation. Sci. Immunol. 8, eade2335 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. An overview of host‐derived molecules that interact with gut microbiota. iMeta 2, e88 (2023).
Google Scholar
Herr, A. B., White, C. L., Milburn, C., Wu, C. & Bjorkman, P. J. Bivalent binding of IgA1 to FcαRI suggests a mechanism for cytokine activation of IgA phagocytosis. J. Mol. Biol. 327, 645–657 (2003).
Google Scholar
Donaldson, G. P. et al. Gut microbiota utilize immunoglobulin A for mucosal colonization. Science 360, 795–800 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, R., Chang, Y. & Wang, X. Gut bacteria induce IgA expression in pituitary hormone-secreting cells during aging. iScience 26, 107747 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lazzaro, B. P., Zasloff, M. & Rolff, J. Antimicrobial peptides: application informed by evolution. Science 368, eaau5480 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mookherjee, N., Anderson, M. A., Haagsman, H. P. & Davidson, D. J. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 311–332 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jarret, A. et al. Enteric nervous system-derived IL-18 orchestrates mucosal barrier immunity. Cell 180, 50–63.e12 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pierre, J. F. et al. Peptide YY: a Paneth cell antimicrobial peptide that maintains Candida gut commensalism. Science 381, 502–508 (2023).
Google Scholar
Unckless, R. L., Howick, V. M. & Lazzaro, B. P. Convergent balancing selection on an antimicrobial peptide in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 26, 257–262 (2016).
Google Scholar
Unckless, R. L. & Lazzaro, B. P. The potential for adaptive maintenance of diversity in insect antimicrobial peptides. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371, 20150291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zanchi, C., Johnston, P. R. & Rolff, J. Evolution of defence cocktails: antimicrobial peptide combinations reduce mortality and persistent infection. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5334–5343 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hanson, M. A., Grollmus, L. & Lemaitre, B. Ecology-relevant bacteria drive the evolution of host antimicrobial peptides in. Drosoph. Sci. 381, eadg5725 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nakatsuji, T. et al. Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaah4680 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S. & Hooper, L. V. Antimicrobial defense of the Intestine. Immunity 42, 28–39 (2015).
Google Scholar
McDonough, K. A. & Rodriguez, A. The myriad roles of cyclic AMP in microbial pathogens: from signal to sword. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 27–38 (2012).
Google Scholar
Friedman, E. S. et al. Microbes vs. chemistry in the origin of the anaerobic gut lumen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 4170–4175 (2018).
Google Scholar
Litvak, Y., Byndloss, M. X. & Bäumler, A. J. Colonocyte metabolism shapes the gut microbiota. Science 362, eaat9076 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. ABO genotype alters the gut microbiota by regulating GalNAc levels in pigs. Nature 606, 358–367 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhernakova, D. V. et al. Host genetic regulation of human gut microbial structural variation. Nature 625, 813–821 (2024).
Google Scholar
Berry, D. et al. Host-compound foraging by intestinal microbiota revealed by single-cell stable isotope probing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 4720–4725 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cani, P. D., Depommier, C., Derrien, M., Everard, A. & de Vos, W. M. Akkermansia muciniphila: paradigm for next-generation beneficial microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 625–637 (2022).
Schwerd, T. et al. NOX1 loss-of-function genetic variants in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol. 11, 562–574 (2018).
Google Scholar
Murdoch, C. C. & Skaar, E. P. Nutritional immunity: the battle for nutrient metals at the host–pathogen interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 657–670. (2022).
Bessman, N. J. et al. Dendritic cell–derived hepcidin sequesters iron from the microbiota to promote mucosal healing. Science 368, 186–189 (2020).
Google Scholar
Van Niel, G., D’Angelo, G. & Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 213–228 (2018).
Google Scholar
Malmuthuge, N. & Guan, L. L. Noncoding RNAs: regulatory molecules of host–microbiome crosstalk. Trends Microbiol. 29, 713–724 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, S. et al. The host shapes the gut microbiota via fecal MicroRNA. Cell Host Microbe 19, 32–43 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. et al. Gut microbiota regulate tumor metastasis via circRNA/miRNA networks. Gut Microbes 12, 1788891 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abdullah, S. T. et al. Role of circular RNAs and gut microbiome in gastrointestinal cancers and therapeutic targets. Non-Coding RNA Res. 9, 236–252 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lyte, M. & Ernst, S. Catecholamine induced growth of gram negative bacteria. Life Sci. 50, 203–212 (1992).
Google Scholar
Lyte, M. The role of microbial endocrinology in infectious disease. J. Endocrinol. 137, 343–345 (1993).
Google Scholar
Gao, A. et al. Sexual dimorphism in glucose metabolism is shaped by androgen-driven gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 12, 7080 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A. et al. Colitis‐induced colorectal cancer and intestinal epithelial estrogen receptor beta impact gut microbiota diversity. Int. J. Cancer 144, 3086–3098 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guan, Z. et al. Estrogen deficiency induces bone loss through the gut microbiota. Pharmacol. Res. 196, 106930 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, J.-Y. et al. Sex steroid deficiency–associated bone loss is microbiota dependent and prevented by probiotics. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 2049–2063 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hiller, C. C. et al. Influence of catecholamines on biofilm formation by Salmonella Enteritidis. Microb. Pathog. 130, 54–58 (2019).
Google Scholar
Asano, Y. et al. Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am. J. Physiol.—Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 303, G1288–G1295 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yang, D., Kong, Y., Sun, W., Kong, W. & Shi, Y. A dopamine-responsive signal transduction controls transcription of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium virulence genes. mBio 10, e02772–18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Scheiman, J. et al. Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat. Med. 25, 1104–1109 (2019).
Google Scholar
Priest, C. & Tontonoz, P. Inter-organ cross-talk in metabolic syndrome. Nat. Metab. 1, 1177–1188 (2019).
Google Scholar
Koren, O. et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 150, 470–480 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tarracchini, C. et al. Genetic strategies for sex-biased persistence of gut microbes across human life. Nat. Commun. 14, 4220 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brown, K. et al. Microbiota alters the metabolome in an age- and sex-dependent manner in mice. Nat. Commun. 14, 1348 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mayneris-Perxachs, J. et al. Gut microbiota steroid sexual dimorphism and its impact on gonadal steroids: influences of obesity and menopausal status. Microbiome 8, 136 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, T. S., Shanahan, F. & O’Toole, P. W. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 565–584 (2022).
Google Scholar
Goodrich, J. K. et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell 159, 789–799 (2014).
Google Scholar
Deschasaux, M. et al. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat. Med. 24, 1526–1531 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sen, P. et al. Microbiota and sleep: awakening the gut feeling. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 935–945 (2021).
Google Scholar
Almand, A. T. et al. The influence of perceived stress on the human microbiome. BMC Res. Notes 15, 193 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dohnalová, L. et al. A microbiome-dependent gut–brain pathway regulates motivation for exercise. Nature 612, 739–747 (2022).
Google Scholar
Thirion, F. et al. The gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis varies with disease activity. Genome Med. 15, 1 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Aberrant gut microbiota alters host metabolome and impacts renal failure in humans and rodents. Gut 69, 2131–2142 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yannakoulia, M. & Scarmeas, N. Diets. N. Engl. J. Med. 390, 2098–2106 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, R. K. et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J. Transl. Med. 15, 73 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wu, G. D. et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zmora, N., Suez, J. & Elinav, E. You are what you eat: diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 35–56 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Filippo, C. et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 14691–14696 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bourdeau-Julien, I. et al. The diet rapidly and differentially affects the gut microbiota and host lipid mediators in a healthy population. Microbiome 11, 26 (2023).
Google Scholar
David, L. A. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. A high-fat diet promotes cancer progression by inducing gut microbiota–mediated leucine production and PMN-MDSC differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 121, e2306776121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dohrn, G. Gut microbes linked to fatty diet drive tumour growth. Nature (2024).
Suez, J. et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature 514, 181–186 (2014).
Google Scholar
Makki, K., Deehan, E. C., Walter, J. & Bäckhed, F. The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 23, 705–715 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ze, X., Duncan, S. H., Louis, P. & Flint, H. J. Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon. ISME J. 6, 1535–1543 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shigehisa, A. et al. Characterization of a bifidobacterial system that utilizes galacto-oligosaccharides. Microbiology 161, 1463–1470 (2015).
Google Scholar
Clark, R. L. et al. Design of synthetic human gut microbiome assembly and butyrate production. Nat. Commun. 12, 3254 (2021).
Google Scholar
Crost, E. H. et al. Mechanistic Insights Into the Cross-Feeding of Ruminococcus gnavus and Ruminococcus bromii on Host and Dietary Carbohydrates. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2558 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nie, Q. et al. Targeted modification of gut microbiota and related metabolites via dietary fiber. Carbohydr. Polym. 316, 120986 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. I. et al. Curated and harmonized gut microbiome 16S rRNA amplicon data from dietary fiber intervention studies in humans. Sci. Data 10, 346 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Diet mediate the impact of host habitat on gut microbiome and influence clinical indexes by modulating gut microbes and serum metabolites. Adv. Sci. 11, 2310068 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zinöcker, M. & Lindseth, I. The western diet–microbiome-host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients 10, 365 (2018).
Google Scholar
Latorre-Pérez, A. et al. The Spanish gut microbiome reveals links between microorganisms and Mediterranean diet. Sci. Rep. 11, 21602 (2021).
Google Scholar
Meslier, V. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention in overweight and obese subjects lowers plasma cholesterol and causes changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome independently of energy intake. Gut 69, 1258–1268 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ben-Yacov, O. et al. Gut microbiome modulates the effects of a personalised postprandial-targeting (PPT) diet on cardiometabolic markers: a diet intervention in pre-diabetes. Gut 72, 1486–1496 (2023).
Wang, D. D. et al. The gut microbiome modulates the protective association between a Mediterranean diet and cardiometabolic disease risk. Nat. Med. 27, 333–343 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hansen, T. H. et al. Impact of a vegan diet on the human salivary microbiota. Sci. Rep. 8, 5847 (2018).
Google Scholar
Landberg, R. & Hanhineva, K. Biomarkers of a Healthy Nordic Diet—From Dietary Exposure Biomarkers to Microbiota Signatures in the Metabolome. Nutrients 12, 27 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jama, H. A., Beale, A., Shihata, W. A. & Marques, F. Z. The effect of diet on hypertensive pathology: is there a link via gut microbiota-driven immunometabolism? Cardiovasc. Res. 115, 1435–1447 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xue, Z. et al. The bamboo-eating giant panda harbors a carnivore-like gut microbiota, with excessive seasonal variations. mBio 6, e00022–15 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ang, Q. Y. et al. Ketogenic diets alter the gut microbiome resulting in decreased intestinal Th17 cells. Cell 181, 1263–1275.e16 (2020).
Google Scholar
Miao, Z. et al. Gut microbiota signatures of long-term and short-term plant-based dietary pattern and cardiometabolic health: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 20, 204 (2022).
Google Scholar
Von Schwartzenberg, R. J. et al. Caloric restriction disrupts the microbiota and colonization resistance. Nature 595, 272–277 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ismail, I. H. et al. Dietary patterns in childhood and their effect on gut microbiota—an Asian perspective on atopy risk. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 146, 1005–1007 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sonnenburg, J. L. & Bäckhed, F. Diet–microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature 535, 56–64 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555, 210–215 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gacesa, R. et al. Environmental factors shaping the gut microbiome in a Dutch population. Nature 604, 732–739 (2022).
Google Scholar
Linz, B. et al. An African origin for the intimate association between humans and Helicobacter pylori. Nature 445, 915–918 (2007).
Google Scholar
Falush, D. et al. Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science 299, 1582–1585 (2003).
Google Scholar
Thorpe, H. A. et al. Repeated out-of-Africa expansions of Helicobacter pylori driven by replacement of deleterious mutations. Nat. Commun. 13, 6842 (2022).
Google Scholar
Coelho, L. P. et al. Towards the biogeography of prokaryotic genes. Nature 601, 252–256 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gupta, V. K., Paul, S. & Dutta, C. Geography, ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in human microbiome composition and diversity. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1162 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lin, L. et al. The airway microbiome mediates the interaction between environmental exposure and respiratory health in humans. Nat. Med. 29, 1750–1759. (2023).
Ying, S. et al. The influence of age and gender on skin-associated microbial communities in urban and rural human populations. PLoS ONE 10, e0141842 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.-D. et al. Greenspace and human microbiota: a systematic review. Environ. Int. 187, 108662 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. Regional variation limits applications of healthy gut microbiome reference ranges and disease models. Nat. Med. 24, 1532–1535 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tierney, B. T. et al. Longitudinal multi-omics analysis of host microbiome architecture and immune responses during short-term spaceflight. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 1661–1675 (2024).
Weersma, R. K., Zhernakova, A. & Fu, J. Interaction between drugs and the gut microbiome. Gut 69, 1510–1519 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lam, K. N., Alexander, M. & Turnbaugh, P. J. Precision medicine goes microscopic: engineering the microbiome to improve drug outcomes. Cell Host Microbe 26, 22–34 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wollein Waldetoft, K., Sundius, S., Kuske, R. & Brown, S. P. Defining the benefits of antibiotic resistance in commensals and the scope for resistance optimization. mBio 14, e01349–22 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bhattarai, S. K. et al. Commensal antimicrobial resistance mediates microbiome resilience to antibiotic disruption. Sci. Transl. Med. 16, eadi9711 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Antidepressants can induce mutation and enhance persistence toward multiple antibiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2208344120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Maier, L. et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature 555, 623–628 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jackson, M. A. et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Gut 65, 749–756 (2016).
Google Scholar
Imhann, F. et al. Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut 65, 740–748 (2016).
Google Scholar
De La Cuesta-Zuluaga, J. et al. Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid–producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care 40, 54–62 (2017).
Google Scholar
Forslund, S. K. et al. Combinatorial, additive and dose-dependent drug–microbiome associations. Nature 600, 500–505 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sousa, T. et al. On the colonic bacterial metabolism of azo-bonded prodrugsof 5-aminosalicylic acid. J. Pharm. Sci. 103, 3171–3175 (2014).
Google Scholar
Haiser, H. J. et al. Predicting and manipulating cardiac drug inactivation by the human gut bacterium Eggerthella lenta. Science 341, 295–298 (2013).
Google Scholar
Klatt, N. R. et al. Vaginal bacteria modify HIV tenofovir microbicide efficacy in African women. Science 356, 938–945 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wallace, B. D. et al. Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme. Science 330, 831–835 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M., Zimmermann-Kogadeeva, M., Wegmann, R. & Goodman, A. L. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature 570, 462–467 (2019).
Google Scholar
Heinken, A. et al. Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of 7,302 human microorganisms for personalized medicine. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1320–1331 (2023).
Wang, D.-R., Wu, X.-L. & Sun, Y.-L. Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 331 (2022).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. et al. Effects of microbiota on anticancer drugs: current knowledge and potential applications. eBioMedicine 83, 104197 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stein-Thoeringer, C. K. et al. A non-antibiotic-disrupted gut microbiome is associated with clinical responses to CD19-CAR-T cell cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 29, 906–916 (2023).
Faust, K. & Raes, J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 538–550 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jiang, M.-Z. et al. Gut microbial interactions based on network construction and bacterial pairwise cultivation. Sci. China Life Sci. 67,1751–1762 (2024).
Krishnan, N., Csiszár, V., Móri, T. F. & Garay, J. Genesis of ectosymbiotic features based on commensalistic syntrophy. Sci. Rep. 14, 1366 (2024).
Google Scholar
Culp, E. J. & Goodman, A. L. Cross-feeding in the gut microbiome: ecology and mechanisms. Cell Host Microbe 31, 485–499 (2023).
Google Scholar
Maree, M. et al. Natural transformation allows transfer of SCCmec-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Nat. Commun. 13, 2477 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhong, Q. et al. Episymbiotic Saccharibacteria TM7x modulates the susceptibility of its host bacteria to phage infection and promotes their coexistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 121, e2319790121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lamkin, J. & Lavner, J. A. Antagonism and romantic relationships. in The Handbook of Antagonism 269–280 (Elsevier, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814627-9.00018-9.
Clardy, J., Fischbach, M. A. & Currie, C. R. The natural history of antibiotics. Curr. Biol. 19, R437–R441 (2009).
Google Scholar
Johnston, L. A. Competitive interactions between cells: death, growth, and geography. Science 324, 1679–1682 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. E. S. et al. The role of exploitation in the establishment of mutualistic microbial symbioses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz148 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shkoporov, A. N., Turkington, C. J. & Hill, C. Mutualistic interplay between bacteriophages and bacteria in the human gut. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 737–749 (2022).
Google Scholar
Morin, M. A., Morrison, A. J., Harms, M. J. & Dutton, R. J. Higher-order interactions shape microbial interactions as microbial community complexity increases. Sci. Rep. 12, 22640 (2022).
Google Scholar
Amit, G. & Bashan, A. Top-down identification of keystone taxa in the microbiome. Nat. Commun. 14, 3951 (2023).
Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100, 65–75 (1966).
Google Scholar
Libertucci, J. & Young, V. B. The role of the microbiota in infectious diseases. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 35–45 (2018).
Google Scholar
Newton, W. L., Weinstein, P. P. & Jones, M. F. A comparison of the development of some rat and mouse helminths in germfree and conventional guinea pigs. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 78, 290–307 (2006).
Google Scholar
Phillips, B. P. et al. Studies on the ameba-bacteria relationship in amebiasis; comparative results of the intracecal inoculation of germfree, monocontaminated, and conventional guinea pigs with Entamoeba histolytica. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4, 675–692 (1955).
Google Scholar
Phillips, B. P. & Wolfe, P. A. The use of germfree guinea pigs in studies on the microbial interrelationships in amoebiasis*. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 78, 308–314 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lin, T.-L. et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis-related susceptibility to nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Gut Microbes 16, 2361490 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wahl, A. et al. A germ-free humanized mouse model shows the contribution of resident microbiota to human-specific pathogen infection. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 905–915 (2023).
Gosmann, C. et al. Lactobacillus-deficient cervicovaginal bacterial communities are associated with increased HIV acquisition in young South African women. Immunity 46, 29–37 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sulaiman, I. et al. Microbial signatures in the lower airways of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients associated with poor clinical outcome. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1245–1258 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gao, M. et al. Characterization of the human oropharyngeal microbiomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and recovery patients. Adv. Sci. 8, 2102785 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zuo, T., Wu, X., Wen, W. & Lan, P. Gut microbiome alterations in COVID-19. Genomics Proteom. Bioinform. 19, 679–688 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xiao, M. et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of host response and vaginal microbiome of patients with severe COVID-19. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 1473–1476 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Six-month follow-up of gut microbiota richness in patients with COVID-19. Gut 71, 222–225 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yeoh, Y. K. et al. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut 70, 698–706 (2021).
Google Scholar
Patrier, J. et al. Oropharyngeal and intestinal concentrations of opportunistic pathogens are independently associated with death of SARS-CoV-2 critically ill adults. Crit. Care 26, 300 (2022).
Google Scholar
McDonald, B. et al. Programing of an intravascular immune firewall by the gut microbiota protects against pathogen dissemination during infection. Cell Host Microbe 28, 660–668.e4 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, F. et al. Gut microbiota in COVID-19: key microbial changes, potential mechanisms and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20, 323–337 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Richards, E. M., Handberg, E. M., Pepine, C. J. & Raizada, M. K. Butyrate regulates COVID-19–relevant genes in gut epithelial organoids from normotensive rats. Hypertension 77 (2021).
Zhang, F. et al. Prolonged impairment of short-chain fatty acid and l-isoleucine biosynthesis in gut microbiome in patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology 162, 548–561.e4 (2022).
Google Scholar
De Nies, L. et al. Altered infective competence of the human gut microbiome in COVID-19. Microbiome 11, 46 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mizrahi, B. et al. Long covid outcomes at one year after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 380, e072529 (2023).
McIntosh, C. M., Chen, L., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M. & Alegre, M.-L. Gut microbes contribute to variation in solid organ transplant outcomes in mice. Microbiome 6, 96 (2018).
Google Scholar
Swarte, J. C. et al. Gut microbiome dysbiosis is associated with increased mortality after solid organ transplantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabn7566 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bocci, V. The neglected organ: bacterial flora has a crucial immunostimulatory role. Perspect. Biol. Med. 35, 251–260 (1992).
Google Scholar
O’Hara, A. M. & Shanahan, F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep. 7, 688–693 (2006).
Google Scholar
Burcelin, R. et al. Metagenome and metabolism: the tissue microbiota hypothesis: Burcelin et al. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 15, 61–70 (2013).
Google Scholar
Byndloss, M. X. & Bäumler, A. J. The germ-organ theory of non-communicable diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 103–110 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fucarino, A. et al. The microbiota is not an organ: introducing the muco-microbiotic layer as a novel morphofunctional. Struct. Anat. 1, 186–203 (2022).
Chakaroun, R. M., Olsson, L. M. & Bäckhed, F. The potential of tailoring the gut microbiome to prevent and treat cardiometabolic disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 217–235 (2022).
Valles-Colomer, M. et al. Cardiometabolic health, diet and the gut microbiome: a meta-omics perspective. Nat. Med. 29, 551–561 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tonelli, A., Lumngwena, E. N. & Ntusi, N. A. B. The oral microbiome in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 386–403 (2023).
Google Scholar
Violi, F. et al. Gut-derived low-grade endotoxaemia, atherothrombosis and cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 24–37 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. & Hazen, S. L. Microbial modulation of cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 171–181 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lyon, J. The lung microbiome: key to respiratory ills? JAMA 317, 1713 (2017).
Google Scholar
Budden, K. F. et al. Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 907–920 (2019).
Google Scholar
Barcik, W., Boutin, R. C. T., Sokolowska, M. & Finlay, B. B. The role of lung and gut microbiota in the pathology of asthma. Immunity 52, 241–255 (2020).
Google Scholar
Neish, A. S. Microbes in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology 136, 65–80 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sorboni, S. G., Moghaddam, H. S., Jafarzadeh-Esfehani, R. & Soleimanpour, S. A comprehensive review on the role of the gut microbiome in human neurological disorders. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 35, e00338–20 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fang, P., Kazmi, S. A., Jameson, K. G. & Hsiao, E. Y. The microbiome as a modifier of neurodegenerative disease risk. Cell Host Microbe 28, 201–222 (2020).
Google Scholar
Willyard, C. How gut microbes could drive brain disorders. Nature 590, 22–25 (2021).
Google Scholar
Agirman, G. & Hsiao, E. Y. SnapShot: the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Cell 184, 2524–2524.e1 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cryan, J. F. et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1877–2013 (2019).
Google Scholar
Qi, X., Yun, C., Pang, Y. & Qiao, J. The impact of the gut microbiota on the reproductive and metabolic endocrine system. Gut Microbes 13, 1894070 (2021).
Google Scholar
Van Hul, M. & Cani, P. D. The gut microbiota in obesity and weight management: microbes as friends or foe? Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 19, 258–271 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fan, Y. & Pedersen, O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 55–71 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hajishengallis, G., Lamont, R. J. & Koo, H. Oral polymicrobial communities: assembly, function, and impact on diseases. Cell Host Microbe 31, 528–538 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tuganbaev, T., Yoshida, K. & Honda, K. The effects of oral microbiota on health. Science 376, 934–936 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stacy, A. & Belkaid, Y. Microbial guardians of skin health. Science 363, 227–228 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miyauchi, E., Shimokawa, C., Steimle, A., Desai, M. S. & Ohno, H. The impact of the gut microbiome on extra-intestinal autoimmune diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 23, 9–23 (2022).
Alcazar, C. G.-M. et al. The association between early-life gut microbiota and childhood respiratory diseases: a systematic review. Lancet Microbe 3, e867–e880 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ruff, W. E., Greiling, T. M. & Kriegel, M. A. Host–microbiota interactions in immune-mediated diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 521–538 (2020).
Google Scholar
Knauf, F., Brewer, J. R. & Flavell, R. A. Immunity, microbiota and kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15, 263–274 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shoubridge, A. P. et al. The gut microbiome and mental health: advances in research and emerging priorities. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 1908–1919 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, L. & Shah, K. The potential of the gut microbiome to reshape the cancer therapy paradigm: a review. JAMA Oncol. 8, 1059 (2022).
Google Scholar
Park, E. M. et al. Targeting the gut and tumor microbiota in cancer. Nat. Med. 28, 690–703 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sepich-Poore, G. D. et al. The microbiome and human cancer. Science 371, eabc4552 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gowen, R., Gamal, A., Di Martino, L., McCormick, T. S. & Ghannoum, M. A. Modulating the microbiome for Crohn’s disease treatment. Gastroenterology 164, 828–840 (2023).
Google Scholar
Motta, J.-P., Wallace, J. L., Buret, A. G., Deraison, C. & Vergnolle, N. Gastrointestinal biofilms in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 314–334 (2021).
Google Scholar
Arumugam, M. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473, 174–180 (2011).
Google Scholar
Costea, P. I. et al. Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 8–16 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H. et al. Impact of early events and lifestyle on the gut microbiota and metabolic phenotypes in young school-age children. Microbiome 7, 2 (2019).
Google Scholar
Knights, D. et al. Rethinking “Enterotypes”. Cell Host Microbe 16, 433–437 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lai, S. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut mycobiome. Microbiome 11, 179 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bourdeau, R. W. et al. Acoustic reporter genes for noninvasive imaging of microorganisms in mammalian hosts. Nature 553, 86–90 (2018).
Google Scholar
Willis, J. R. et al. Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition. Microbiome 6, 218 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gajer, P. et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 4 (2012).
Adolph, E. F. Early concepts of physiological regulations. Physiol. Rev. 41, 737–770 (1961).
Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 9, 399–431 (1929).
Google Scholar
Baptista, V. Starting physiology: understanding homeostasis. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30, 263–264 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kotas, M. E. & Medzhitov, R. Homeostasis, inflammation, and disease susceptibility. Cell 160, 816–827 (2015).
Google Scholar
Davies, K. J. A. Adaptive homeostasis. Mol. Asp. Med. 49, 1–7 (2016).
Google Scholar
Khakisahneh, S., Zhang, X.-Y., Nouri, Z. & Wang, D.-H. Gut microbiota and host thermoregulation in response to ambient temperature fluctuations. mSystems 5, e00514–e00520 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bongers, K. S. et al. The gut microbiome modulates body temperature both in sepsis and health. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 207,1030–1041 (2022).
Li, B. et al. Microbiota depletion impairs thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue and browning of white adipose tissue. Cell Rep. 26, 2720–2737.e5 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gurven, M. et al. Rapidly declining body temperature in a tropical human population. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6599 (2020).
Google Scholar
Protsiv, M., Ley, C., Lankester, J., Hastie, T. & Parsonnet, J. Decreasing human body temperature in the United States since the Industrial Revolution. eLife 9, e49555 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. A widely distributed gene cluster compensates for uricase loss in hominids. Cell 186, 3400–3413.e20 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kasahara, K. et al. Gut bacterial metabolism contributes to host global purine homeostasis. Cell Host Microbe 31, 1038–1053.e10 (2023).
Google Scholar
Johnson, R. J. et al. Do thrifty genes exist? Revisiting uricase. Obesity 30, 1917–1926 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chang, B. S. W. Ancient insights into uric acid metabolism in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 3657–3658 (2014).
Google Scholar
Muller, P. A. et al. Microbiota-modulated CART + enteric neurons autonomously regulate blood glucose. Science 370, 314–321 (2020).
Google Scholar
Suez, J. et al. Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance. Cell 185, 3307–3328.e19 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, B.-Y. et al. Characteristics and correlations of the oral and gut fungal microbiome with hypertension. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e01956–22 (2023).
Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. A., Zheng, T., Meric, G. & Marques, F. Z. The gut microbiome and hypertension. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19, 153–167 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bushyhead, D. & Quigley, E. M. M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth—pathophysiology and its implications for definition and management. Gastroenterology 163, 593–607 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hayase, E. et al. Mucus-degrading Bacteroides link carbapenems to aggravated graft-versus-host disease. Cell 185, 3705–3719.e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lu, Q. & Stappenbeck, T. S. Local barriers configure systemic communications between the host and microbiota. Science 376, 950–955 (2022).
Google Scholar
Anhê, F. F., Barra, N. G., Cavallari, J. F., Henriksbo, B. D. & Schertzer, J. D. Metabolic endotoxemia is dictated by the type of lipopolysaccharide. Cell Rep. 36, 109691 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. The microbiology of multiple organ failure: the proximal gastrointestinal tract as an occult reservoir of pathogens. Arch. Surg. 123, 309 (1988).
Google Scholar
Berg, R. Bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Microbiol. 3, 149–154 (1995).
Google Scholar
Meisel, M. et al. Microbial signals drive pre-leukaemic myeloproliferation in a Tet2-deficient host. Nature 557, 580–584 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peng, S. et al. CRB1-associated retinal degeneration is dependent on bacterial translocation from the gut. Cell 187, 1387–1401.e13 (2024).
Google Scholar
Massier, L. et al. Adipose tissue derived bacteria are associated with inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Gut 69, 1796–1806 (2020).
Google Scholar
Anhê, F. F. et al. Type 2 diabetes influences bacterial tissue compartmentalisation in human obesity. Nat. Metab. 2, 233–242 (2020).
Google Scholar
Simpson, B. W. & Trent, M. S. Pushing the envelope: LPS modifications and their consequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 403–416 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lasselin, J. et al. Comparison of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced sickness behavior in rodents and humans: Relevance for symptoms of anxiety and depression. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 115, 15–24 (2020).
Google Scholar
Page, M. J., Kell, D. B. & Pretorius, E. The role of lipopolysaccharide-induced cell signalling in chronic inflammation. Chronic Stress 6, 247054702210763 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cani, P. D. et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 56, 1761–1772 (2007).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Within-host evolution of a gut pathobiont facilitates liver translocation. Nature 607, 563–570 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hoyles, L. et al. Regulation of blood–brain barrier integrity by microbiome-associated methylamines and cognition by trimethylamine N-oxide. Microbiome 9, 235 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhu, W. et al. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO enhances platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis risk. Cell 165, 111–124 (2016).
Google Scholar
Benson, T. W. et al. Gut microbiota–derived trimethylamine n-oxide contributes to abdominal aortic aneurysm through inflammatory and apoptotic mechanisms. Circulation 147, 1079–1096 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 472, 57–63 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. The microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide promotes antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metab. 34, 581–594.e8 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mirji, G. et al. The microbiome-derived metabolite TMAO drives immune activation and boosts responses to immune checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabn0704 (2022).
Google Scholar
Needham, B. D. et al. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 602, 647–653 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qi, X. et al. Gut microbiota–bile acid–interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med. 25, 1225–1233 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yun, C. et al. The microbial metabolite agmatine acts as an FXR agonist to promote polycystic ovary syndrome in female mice. Nat. Metab. 6, 947–962 (2024).
Google Scholar
Trabelsi, M.-S. et al. Farnesoid X receptor inhibits glucagon-like peptide-1 production by enteroendocrine L cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7629 (2015).
Google Scholar
Koh, A. et al. Microbially produced imidazole propionate impairs insulin signaling through mTORC1. Cell 175, 947–961.e17 (2018).
Google Scholar
Molinaro, A. et al. Imidazole propionate is increased in diabetes and associated with dietary patterns and altered microbial ecology. Nat. Commun. 11, 5881 (2020).
Google Scholar
White, P. J. & Newgard, C. B. Branched-chain amino acids in disease. Science 363, 582–583 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nemet, I. et al. A cardiovascular disease-linked gut microbial metabolite acts via adrenergic receptors. Cell 180, 862–877.e22 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tennoune, N. et al. Bacterial ClpB heat-shock protein, an antigen-mimetic of the anorexigenic peptide α-MSH, at the origin of eating disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 4, e458–e458 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gil-Cruz, C. et al. Microbiota-derived peptide mimics drive lethal inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Science 366, 881–886 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. et al. Microbial-host-isozyme analyses reveal microbial DPP4 as a potential antidiabetic target. Science 381, eadd5787 (2023).
Google Scholar
Granton, E. et al. Biofilm exopolysaccharides alter sensory-neuron-mediated sickness during lung infection. Cell 187, 1874–1888.e14 (2024).
Google Scholar
Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes. Nature 614, 125–135 (2023).
Google Scholar
Finlay, B. B. CIFAR Humans, & the Microbiome. Are noncommunicable diseases communicable? Science 367, 250–251 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sarkar, A. et al. Microbial transmission in the social microbiome and host health and disease. Cell 187, 17–43 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chong, B. et al. Trends and predictions of malnutrition and obesity in 204 countries and territories: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. eClinicalMedicine 57, 101850 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lindstrom, M. et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks collaboration, 1990–2021. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 80, 2372–2425 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Global burden of digestive diseases: a systematic analysis of the global burden of diseases study, 1990–2019. Gastroenterology165, 773–783.e15 (2023).
Ong, K. L. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 402, 203–234 (2023).
Tran, K. B. et al. The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010–19: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 400, 563–591 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fink, G., Tediosi, F. & Felder, S. Burden of Covid-19 restrictions: National, regional and global estimates. eClinicalMedicine 45, 101305 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bello, M. G. D., Knight, R., Gilbert, J. A. & Blaser, M. J. Preserving microbial diversity. Science 362, 33–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Allsup, C. M., George, I. & Lankau, R. A. Shifting microbial communities can enhance tree tolerance to changing climates. Science 380, 835–840 (2023).
Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, J. M. & Kiers, E. T. Rewilding plant microbiomes. Science 378, 599–600 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reardon, S. Faecal transplants could help preserve vulnerable species. Nature 558, 173–174 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cahan, E. As superbugs flourish, bacteriophage therapy recaptures researchers’ interest. JAMA 329, 781 (2023).
Google Scholar
Strathdee, S. A., Hatfull, G. F., Mutalik, V. K. & Schooley, R. T. Phage therapy: from biological mechanisms to future directions. Cell 186, 17–31 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bayfield, O. W. et al. Structural atlas of a human gut crassvirus. Nature 617, 409–416 (2023).
Google Scholar
Benler, S. et al. Thousands of previously unknown phages discovered in whole-community human gut metagenomes. Microbiome 9, 78 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nayfach, S. et al. Metagenomic compendium of 189,680 DNA viruses from the human gut microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 960–970 (2021).
Google Scholar
Camarillo-Guerrero, L. F., Almeida, A., Rangel-Pineros, G., Finn, R. D. & Lawley, T. D. Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell 184, 1098–1109.e9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shkoporov, A. N. & Hill, C. Bacteriophages of the human gut: the “known unknown” of the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 25, 195–209 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yutin, N. et al. Discovery of an expansive bacteriophage family that includes the most abundant viruses from the human gut. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 38–46 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Aschenbrenner, D., Yoo, J. Y. & Zuo, T. The gut mycobiome in health, disease, and clinical applications in association with the gut bacterial microbiome assembly. Lancet Microbe 3, e969–e983 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kong, H. H. & Segre, J. A. Cultivating fungal research. Science 368, 365–366 (2020).
Google Scholar
Thomas, C. M., Desmond-Le Quéméner, E., Gribaldo, S. & Borrel, G. Factors shaping the abundance and diversity of the gut archaeome across the animal kingdom. Nat. Commun. 13, 3358 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hoegenauer, C., Hammer, H. F., Mahnert, A. & Moissl-Eichinger, C. Methanogenic archaea in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 805–813 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pennisi, E. Survey of archaea in the body reveals other microbial guests. Science 358, 983–983 (2017).
Google Scholar
Borrel, G., Brugère, J.-F., Gribaldo, S., Schmitz, R. A. & Moissl-Eichinger, C. The host-associated archaeome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 622–636 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, L., Li, A., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Intratumoral microbiota: roles in cancer initiation, development and therapeutic efficacy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 35 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bullman, S. The intratumoral microbiota: from microniches to single cells. Cell 186, 1532–1534 (2023).
Google Scholar
Swanton, C. et al. Embracing cancer complexity: Hallmarks of systemic disease. Cell 187, 1589–1616 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cao, Y. et al. Intratumoural microbiota: a new frontier in cancer development and therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 15 (2024).
Google Scholar
Blake, S. J., Wolf, Y., Boursi, B. & Lynn, D. J. Role of the microbiota in response to and recovery from cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 24, 308–325 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bai, X. et al. Engineering the gut microbiome. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 665–679 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kurtz, C. B. et al. An engineered E. coli Nissle improves hyperammonemia and survival in mice and shows dose-dependent exposure in healthy humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau7975 (2019).
Google Scholar
Durmusoglu, D. et al. In situ biomanufacturing of small molecules in the mammalian gut by probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 1039–1052 (2021).
Google Scholar
Selle, K. et al. In vivo targeting of clostridioides difficile using phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas3 antimicrobials. mBio 11, e00019–e00020 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lam, K. N. et al. Phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas9 for strain-specific depletion and genomic deletions in the gut microbiome. Cell Rep. 37, 109930 (2021).
Google Scholar
Patel, J. R., Oh, J., Wang, S., Crawford, J. M. & Isaacs, F. J. Cross-kingdom expression of synthetic genetic elements promotes discovery of metabolites in the human microbiome. Cell 185, 1487–1505.e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Engineering consortia by polymeric microbial swarmbots. Nat. Commun. 13, 3879 (2022).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. M. et al. Twenty important research questions in microbial exposure and social equity. mSystems 7, e01240–21 (2022).
Google Scholar
Oduaran, O. H. et al. Microbiome research in Africa must be based on equitable partnerships. Nat. Med. (2024).
Hou, K. et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 135 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. Are We really vastly outnumbered? revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell 164, 337–340 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002533 (2016).
Google Scholar
Porcari, S. et al. Key determinants of success in fecal microbiota transplantation: from microbiome to clinic. Cell Host Microbe 31, 712–733 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ng, R. W. et al. Revisiting the donor screening protocol of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT): a systematic review. Gut 73,1029–1031 (2023).
Gulati, A. S., Nicholson, M. R., Khoruts, A. & Kahn, S. A. Fecal microbiota transplantation across the lifespan: balancing efficacy, safety, and innovation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 118, 435–439 (2023).
Google Scholar
Allegretti, J. R., Mullish, B. H., Kelly, C. & Fischer, M. The evolution of the use of faecal microbiota transplantation and emerging therapeutic indications. Lancet 394, 420–431 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. S. B. et al. Drivers and determinants of strain dynamics following fecal microbiota transplantation. Nat. Med. 28, 1902–1912 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shen, N. T. et al. Timely use of probiotics in hospitalized adults prevents clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis. Gastroenterology 152, 1889–1900.e9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cohen, C. R. et al. Randomized trial of lactin-V to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1906–1915 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goldenberg, J. Z., Mertz, D. & Johnston, B. C. Probiotics to prevent Clostridium difficile infection in patients receiving antibiotics. JAMA 320, 499 (2018).
Google Scholar
Suez, J., Zmora, N., Segal, E. & Elinav, E. The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics. Nat. Med. 25, 716–729 (2019).
Google Scholar
Piewngam, P. et al. Probiotic for pathogen-specific Staphylococcus aureus decolonisation in Thailand: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Microbe 4, e75–e83 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D. J., Reid, G., Gibson, G. R. & Rastall, R. A. Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 605–616 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fagnant, H. S. et al. Orally ingested probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions as countermeasures for gastrointestinal tract infections in nonelderly adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr. 14, 539–554 (2023).
Google Scholar
Swanson, K. S. et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of synbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 687–701 (2020).
Google Scholar
Salminen, S. et al. Author Correction: The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 551–551 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wargo, J. A. Modulating gut microbes. Science 369, 1302–1303 (2020).
Google Scholar
Raffatellu, M. Learning from bacterial competition in the host to develop antimicrobials. Nat. Med. 24, 1097–1103 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sorbara, M. T. & Pamer, E. G. Microbiome-based therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 365–380 (2022).
Google Scholar
Renz, H. & Skevaki, C. Early life microbial exposures and allergy risks: opportunities for prevention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 177–191 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vatanen, T. et al. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature 562, 589–594 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dong, D. et al. Clostridioides difficile aggravates dextran sulfate solution (DSS)-induced colitis by shaping the gut microbiota and promoting neutrophil recruitment. Gut Microbes 15, 2192478 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yadegar, A. et al. Beneficial effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe 31, 695–711 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cohen, S. H. et al. Extended follow-up of microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 328, 2062 (2022).
Google Scholar
Walter, J. & Shanahan, F. Fecal microbiota-based treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Cell 186, 1087 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sims, M. D. et al. Safety and tolerability of SER-109 as an investigational microbiome therapeutic in adults with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a phase 3, open-label, single-arm trial. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2255758 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sehgal, K., Cifu, A. S. & Khanna, S. Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection. JAMA 328, 881 (2022).
Google Scholar
Louie, T. et al. VE303, a defined bacterial consortium, for prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 329, 1356 (2023).
Google Scholar
Garey, K. W. et al. Assessment of quality of life among patients with recurrent clostridioides difficile infection treated with investigational oral microbiome therapeutic SER-109: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2253570 (2023).
Google Scholar
Khoruts, A., Staley, C. & Sadowsky, M. J. Faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile: mechanisms and pharmacology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 67–80 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, R., Xiong, R., Li, Y., Chen, J. & Yan, R. Gut microbiome, metabolome, host immunity associated with inflammatory bowel disease and intervention of fecal microbiota transplantation. J. Autoimmun. 141, 103062 (2023).
Paramsothy, S. et al. Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 389, 1218–1228 (2017).
Google Scholar
Baumgart, D. C. & Le Berre, C. Newer Biologic and small-molecule therapies for inflammatory bowel disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1302–1315 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chang, J. T. Pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2652–2664 (2020).
Google Scholar
Caruso, R., Lo, B. C. & Núñez, G. Host–microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 411–426 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schirmer, M., Garner, A., Vlamakis, H. & Xavier, R. J. Microbial genes and pathways in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 497–511 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lavelle, A. & Sokol, H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 223–237 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lopetuso, L. R. et al. The first international Rome consensus conference on gut microbiota and faecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 72, 1642–1650 (2023).
Xin, Y. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: What we learnt from the explorative clinical trial. J. Autoimmun. 141, 103058 (2023).
Yang, R., Chen, Z. & Cai, J. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Emerging applications in autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. 141, 103038 (2023).
Palmer, J. D. & Foster, K. R. Bacterial species rarely work together. Science 376, 581–582 (2022).
Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. et al. Enterococci enhance Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis. Nature 611, 780–786 (2022).
Google Scholar
Santus, W. et al. Mycobiota and diet-derived fungal xenosiderophores promote Salmonella gastrointestinal colonization. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 2025–2038 (2022).
Google Scholar
Neumann, P. E. & Neumann, E. E. General histological woes: definition and classification of tissues. Clin. Anat. 34, 794–801 (2021).
Google Scholar
Terminology, F. I. C. on A. Terminologia Histologica: International Terms for Human Cytology and Histology (Lippincott Raven, 2008).
Aggarwal, N. et al. Microbiome and Human Health: Current Understanding, Engineering, and Enabling Technologies. Chem. Rev. 123, 31–72 (2022).
Javan, G. T. et al. Human thanatomicrobiome succession and time since death. Sci. Rep. 6, 29598 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hasan, N. & Yang, H. Factors affecting the composition of the gut microbiota, and its modulation. PeerJ 7, e7502 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dimitriu, P. A. et al. New insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that shape the human skin microbiome. mBio 10, e00839–19 (2019).
Google Scholar
Flandroy, L. et al. The impact of human activities and lifestyles on the interlinked microbiota and health of humans and of ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 627, 1018–1038 (2018).
Google Scholar
link
